Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Determination of the impact of prognostic factors on disease-free and overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer; oncological outcomes and retrospective analysis of 1028 cases
1Department of Oncology, Azerbaijan Medical University, AZ1022 Baku, Azerbaijan
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege Hospital, AZ1022 Baku, Azerbaijan
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cerrahpaşa Medical University of Istanbul, 34098 Istanbul, Türkiye
Submitted: 30 June 2025 Accepted: 30 July 2025
Online publish date: 25 September 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Akbar Ibrahimov E-mail: eibrahimov1@amu.edu.az
† These authors contributed equally.
Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence is increasing. This study determined prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in EC patients from a single tertiary center over 22 years. Methods: 1028 patients who underwent surgery for EC between 2000–2022 were evaluated retrospectively using International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: 899 (87.7%) patients had endometrioid histology. Grade distribution: 475 (46.2%) grade 1, 371 (36.1%) grade 2, 170 (16.75%) grade 3. FIGO staging: 833 (81.0%) stage I, 71 (7%) stage II, 87 (9%) stage III, 31 (3.0%) stage IV. 368 (35.8%) patients had ≥50% myometrial invasion, 130 (12.7%) cervical involvement, 384 (37.53%) lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), 80 (7.8%) lymph node metastases. Risk classification: 520 (50.6%) low risk, 195 (19.0%) intermediate risk, 121 (11.8%) high-intermediate risk, 190 (18.6%) high risk. Lower OS and DFS rates were significantly associated with non-endometrioid histology, advanced stage, high grade, high risk classification, ≥50% myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, lymph node metastases, and LVSI (all p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, independent DFS prognostic factors were FIGO stage (hazard ratios (HR): 4.37 for stage II, HR: 8.68 for stage III, both p < 0.001) and tumor grade (HR: 2.26 for grade 2, p = 0.039; HR: 4.52 for grade 3, p < 0.001). Independent OS prognostic factors were risk classification (HR: 2.12 for intermediate-high risk, p = 0.031; HR: 2.75 for high risk, p = 0.003) and tumor grade (HR: 1.86 for grade 2, p = 0.024; HR: 2.71 for grade 3, p = 0.002). Median follow-up was 84 months. Conclusions: FIGO staging, tumor grade, histopathological type, risk classification, myometrial invasion depth, cervical involvement, LVSI, and lymph node metastases significantly affected survival outcomes. These findings support comprehensive surgical staging and histopathological assessment for prognostic stratification.
Endometrial cancer; Prognostic factor; Disease-free survival; Overall survival; FIGO staging; Lymph node management
Akbar Ibrahimov,Aytaj Gafarova,Tugan Bese. Determination of the impact of prognostic factors on disease-free and overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer; oncological outcomes and retrospective analysis of 1028 cases. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2025.doi:10.22514/ejgo.2025.124.
[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 7–33.
[2] Dyba T, Randi G, Bray F, Martos C, Giusti F, Nicholson N, et al. The European cancer burden in 2020: incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers. European Journal of Cancer. 2021; 157: 308–347.
[3] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.
[4] Çakır İ, Gülseren V, Özdemir İA, Abacı H, Talu ECK, Çakır ZE, et al. Characteristics of patients with late recurrence endometrial cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics. 2024; 20: 232–237.
[5] Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2005; 55: 74–108.
[6] Gavrilyuk O, Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Licaj I, Lund E. Lifetime number of years of menstruation as a risk index for postmenopausal endometrial cancer in the Norwegian women and cancer study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2018; 97: 1168–1177.
[7] Hutt S, Mihaies D, Karteris E, Michael A, Payne AM, Chatterjee J. Statistical meta-analysis of risk factors for endometrial cancer and development of a risk prediction model using an artificial neural network algorithm. Cancers. 2021; 13: 3689.
[8] Koutoukidis DA, Beeken RJ, Manchanda R, Burnell M, Knobf MT, Lanceley A. Diet and exercise in uterine cancer survivors (DEUS pilot)—piloting a healthy eating and physical activity program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016; 17: 130.
[9] Njoku K, Agnew HJ, Crosbie EJ. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on endometrial cancer survival: a prospective database analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022; 12: 899262.
[10] Tempfer CB, Hilal Z, Kern P, Juhasz-Boess I, Rezniczek GA. Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Cancers. 2020; 12: 2195.
[11] Mangone L, Marinelli F, Bisceglia I, Braghiroli MB, Mastrofilippo V, Pezzarossi A, et al. Optimizing outcomes through a multidisciplinary team approach in endometrial cancer. Healthcare. 2023; 12: 64.
[12] Kim NR, So KA, Kim TJ, Lim K, Lee KH, Kim MK. Role of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate to high-risk early stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2023; 34: e23.
[13] Bostan IS, Mihaila M, Roman V, Radu N, Neagu MT, Bostan M, et al. Landscape of Endometrial cancer: molecular mechanisms, biomarkers, and target therapy. Cancers. 2024; 16: 2027.
[14] Berek JS, Matias-Guiu X, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Gaffney D, Kehoe S, et al. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2023; 162: 383–394.
[15] Miller EM, Patterson NE, Gressel GM, Karabakhtsian RG, Bejerano-Sagie M, Ravi N, et al. Utility of a custom designed next generation DNA sequencing gene panel to molecularly classify endometrial cancers according to The Cancer Genome Atlas subgroups. BMC Medical Genomics. 2020; 13: 179.
[16] Anca-Stanciu MB, Manu A, Olinca MV, Coroleucă C, Comandașu DE, Coroleuca CA, et al. Comprehensive review of endometrial cancer: new molecular and FIGO classification and recent treatment changes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14: 1385.
[17] León-Castillo A, Gilvazquez E, Nout R, Smit VT, McAlpine JN, McConechy M, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple-classifier’ endometrial carcinomas. Journal of Pathology. 2020; 250: 312–322.
[18] Jumaah AS, Al-Haddad HS, McAllister KA, Yasseen AA. The clinicopathology and survival characteristics of patients with POLE proofreading mutations in endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0263585.
[19] Sehnal B, Hruda M, Matej R, Robova H, Drozenova J, Pichlik T, et al. New FIGO 2023 staging system of endometrial cancer: an updated review on a current hot topic. Thieme Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2025; 85: 405–416.
[20] Daix M, Angeles MA, Migliorelli F, Kakkos A, Martinez Gomez C, Delbecque K, et al. Concordance between preoperative ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and final histology in early-stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Gynecological Oncology. 2021; 32: e48.
[21] Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2021; 155: 45–60.
[22] Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, Giornelli G, Harter P, Joly F, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2022; 33: 860–877.
[23] Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2021; 154: 327–353.
[24] Genc SO, Gulturk EA, Kurt B. Predictive value of PLR, PNI, and HALP scores in ovarian cancer staging. Cancer Management and Research. 2025; 17: 293–299.
[25] Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, Hogg R, Jobling TW, Land R, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2010; 11: 772–780.
[26] Tortorella L, Restaino S, Zannoni GF, Vizzielli G, Chiantera V, Cappuccio S, et al. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as predictor of distant relapse and poor prognosis in low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2021; 32: e11.
[27] Wang J, Xu P, Yang X, Yu Q, Xu X, Zou G, et al. Association of myometrial invasion with lymphovascular space invasion, lymph node metastasis, recurrence, and overall survival in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of 79 studies with 68,870 patients. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021; 11: 762329.
[28] Cibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, Centeno C, Chargari C, Felix A, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer—update 2023. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023; 33: 649–666.
[29] Bilgi A, Guler AH, Kulhan M, Cintesun E, Ates M, Celik C. The struggle against endometrial cancer: ten years of experience of a tertiary center. Ginekologia Polska. 2022; 93: 351–360.
[30] Altın D, Akıncı T, Taşkın S, Ortaç F. Predictors of recurrence and survival in lymphovascular space invasion negative early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association. 2023; 24: 261–270.
[31] Cuylan ZF, Akilli H, Gungorduk K, Demirkiran F, Oz M, Salman MC, et al. Is the extent of lymphadenectomy a prognostic factor in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2021; 47: 1134–1144.
[32] Oliver-Perez MR, Padilla-Iserte P, Arencibia-Sanchez O, Martin-Arriscado C, Muruzabal JC, Diaz-Feijóo B, et al. Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer (LySEC): patterns of recurrence and predictors. A multicentre retrospective cohort study of the spain gynecologic oncology group. Cancers. 2023; 15: 2612.
[33] Ignatov A, Mészáros J, Ivros S, Gennari P, Ignatov T. Oncologic outcome of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer. Cancers. 2023; 15: 5894.
[34] Çağlıyan Ö, Yazıcı H, Yaşar AC, Bekki YÇ, Tan S, Oymacı E, et al. Could the HALP score indicate poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients? Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2025; 41: 154–159.
[35] Auletta V, Hassan ME, Kather A, Gaßler N, Bokhua D, Runnebaum IB. Minimally invasive surgery in endometrial cancer: superior for low-risk and comparable for high-risk cases in a 20-year cohort study. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2025; 85: 724–735.
[36] Amengual Vila J, Torrent Colomer A, Sampol Bas C, Quintero Duarte A, Ruiz Coll M, Rioja Merlo J, et al. A hybrid approach: a safe option for surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2023; 27: 8905–8914.
[37] Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, Cantrell L, Schuler K, Hanna RK, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. The Lancet. Oncology. 2017; 18: 384–392.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top