Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Influence of fatigue, psychological distress, social support, and uncertainty appraisal on quality of life in post-treatment patients with gynecological cancer
1College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Jeonbuk National University, 54896 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
2College of Nursing, Jeonbuk National University, 54896 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907 Jeonju, Republic of Korea
DOI: 10.22514/ejgo.2026.005 Vol.47,Issue 1,January 2026 pp.40-49
Submitted: 13 October 2025 Accepted: 02 December 2025
Published: 15 January 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Dong Hyu Cho E-mail: obgyn2001@jbnu.ac.kr
Background: This study aimed to examine the levels of fatigue, psychological distress, social support, uncertainty appraisal, and quality of life (QoL) in post-treatment patients with gynecological cancer and to evaluate how these factors influence their QoL. Methods: A cross-sectional correlation study was conducted with 150 women with gynecological cancer recruited through convenience sampling from the outpatient gynecology clinic of a tertiary hospital in Jeonju, South Korea. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire between 20 November 2024, and 10 January 2025. Statistical analyses included an independent t-test, analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis. Results: The majority of participants were diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer (74.0%). The mean QoL score was moderate to high (78.11 ± 14.20). QoL was positively correlated with higher fatigue scores (lower levels of fatigue) (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), greater social support (r = 0.58, p < 0.001), and higher opportunity appraisal (r = 0.34, p < 0.001), and negatively correlated with psychological distress (r = −0.59, p < 0.001) and danger appraisal (r = −0.28, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis identified fatigue (β = 0.45, p < 0.001) and social support (β = 0.36, p < 0.001) as significant predictors of QoL, accounting for 60.0% of the variance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical role of fatigue reduction and enhanced social support in improving the QoL of post-treatment patients with gynecological cancer. Targeted interventions addressing both physical and psychosocial factors are recommended for comprehensive survivorship care.
Fatigue; Psychological distress; Quality of life; Social support; Uncertainty
Ju-Hee Nho,Eun Suk Hwang,Won Ku Choi,Bo Ram Yu,Dong Hyu Cho. Influence of fatigue, psychological distress, social support, and uncertainty appraisal on quality of life in post-treatment patients with gynecological cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2026. 47(1);40-49.
[1] Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center. Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2022. 2025. Available at: https://ncc.re.kr/cancerStatsView.ncc?bbsnum=720&searchKey=total&searchValue=&pageNum= (Accessed: 12 July 2025).
[2] National Cancer Information Center (Korea). Cancer incidence. 2025. Available at: https://www.cancer.go.kr/lay1/S1T639C649/contents.do (Accessed: 26 September 2025).
[3] Gil-Ibanez B, Davies-Oliveira J, Lopez G, Díaz-Feijoo B, Tejerizo-Garcia A, Sehouli J. Impact of gynecological cancers on health-related quality of life: historical context, measurement instruments, and current knowledge. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023; 33: 1800–1806.
[4] Zhao J, Zhan L, Pang Y, Shen S, Huang J, Zhang W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cancer-related fatigue in women with malignant gynecological tumors: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2025; 25: 827.
[5] Betea R, Dima M, Chiriac VD. Quality of life and stress-related psychological distress among patients with cervical cancer: a cross-sectional analysis. Diseases. 2025; 13: 70.
[6] National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): distress management. Version 2. 2024. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1431 (Accessed: 30 September 2025).
[7] Vernon MM, Datta B, Coughlin SS. Depressive disorder among gynecologic cancer survivors in the US: evidence from the 2020 behavioral risk factor surveillance survey. Cancer Epidemiology. 2025; 96: 102795.
[8] Roussin M, Lowe JB, Hamilton AL, Martin LA. Sexual quality of life in young gynaecological cancer survivors: a qualitative study. Quality of Life Research. 2023; 32: 2107–2115.
[9] Mandato VD, Paterlini M, Torricelli F, Rabitti E, Mastrofilippo V, Aguzzoli L. Perceived social support and quality of life in endometrial cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Oncology. 2024; 14: 1447644.
[10] Acoba EF. Social support and mental health: the mediating role of perceived stress. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024; 15: 1330720.
[11] Widodo D, Djuwadi G, Budianto B, Halis F. Physical conditions, psychosocial, and social support affects the quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Indonesian Journal Cancer. 2025; 19: 27–33.
[12] Shen Z, Zhang L, Shi S, Ruan C, Dan L, Li C. The relationship between uncertainty and fear of disease progression among newly diagnosed cancer patients: the mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24: 756.
[13] Yang Y, Liu S. Uncertainty affects cancer-related fatigue among breast cancer women undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter chemotherapy: the chain mediating role of psychological resilience and self-care. BMC Women’s Health. 2024; 24: 344.
[14] Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Leigh S, Ly J, Gulasekaram P. Quality of life in long term cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1995; 22: 915–922.
[15] Mun S, Park H. The impact of peripheral neuropathy symptoms, self-care ability, and disturbances to daily life on quality of life among gynecological cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2022; 28: 296–306.
[16] Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1993; 11: 570–579.
[17] FACIT.org. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—fatigue scale (FACIT-fatigue). 1997. Available at: https://www.facit.org/measures/facit-fatigue (Accessed: 02 June 2024).
[18] Van Belle S, Paridaens R, Evers G, Kerger J, Bron D, Foubert J, et al. Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria with FACT-F and VAS for cancer-related fatigue: proposal for use as a screening tool. Support Care in Cancer. 2005; 13: 246–254.
[19] Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2005; 44: 227–239.
[20] Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1988; 52: 30–41.
[21] Mishel MH, Sorenson DS. Uncertainty in gynecological cancer: a test of the mediating functions of mastery and coping. Nursing Research. 1991; 40: 167–171.
[22] Jung HJ, Hong YJ, Hong SY, Nho JH. Influencing factors on quality of life in women undergoing cancer treatment: a cross-sectional study. Women’s Health Nursing. 2025; 31: 192–202.
[23] An M, Jeong SG, Nho JH. Influencing factors of quality of life among Korean women in one-person and multiperson households: analysis of the 8th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Journal of Korean Maternal and Child Health. 2025; 29: 228–241.
[24] Akgor U, Kurtay S, Ustun Y. Quality of life and mental health among gynaecological cancer patients towards the end of COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2024; 45: 132–139.
[25] Ogamba CF, Joseph A, Adefemi AK, Ezegwui CO, Major A, Jimoh RO, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life and financial toxicity among gynecological cancer patients in Southern Nigeria. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15: 28041.
[26] Jónsdóttir B, Wikman A, Sundström Poromaa I, Stålberg K. Advanced gynecological cancer: quality of life one year after diagnosis. PLOS ONE. 2023; 18: e0287562.
[27] Kirca N, Adibelli D, Toptas T, Yilmaz S. Perceived social support, fatigue, and sleep quality in women treated for gynecological cancer: a cross-sectional study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2025; 33: 636.
[28] Stone P, Richards M, A’Hern R, Hardy J. A study to investigate the prevalence, severity and correlates of fatigue among patients with cancer in comparison with a control group of volunteers without cancer. Annals of Oncology. 2000; 11: 561–567.
[29] Li CC, Chang TC, Chang CW, Huang CH, Tasi YF, Huang CL, et al. Quality of life and climacteric symptoms in women with endometrial cancer: examining the impact of lower limb lymphedema. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2025; 9: 66.
[30] An H, Nho JH, Yoo S, Kim H, Nho M, Yoo H. Effects of lifestyle intervention on fatigue, nutritional status and quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2015; 45: 812–822. (In Korean)
[31] Lim HW, Son HM, Han GM, Kim TH. Stigma and quality of life in lung cancer patients: the mediating effect of distress and the moderated mediating effect of social support. Asian-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2024; 11: 100483.
[32] Chama Z, Jabir M, Jaafar HK, Saleh HM, Hulail HM, Prasad KDV. The relationship between social support and quality of life in cancer patients. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2025; 63: 201–214.
[33] Ding Y, Wang X, Zhang F, Yan H, Liu Y, Zhang L. The relationship between perceived social support, coping styles and quality of life and psychological state of lung cancer patients. BMC Psychology. 2024; 12: 439.
[34] Kim GH, Kim MJ. Impacts of psychological distress, gender role attitude, and housekeeping sharing on quality of life of gynecologic cancer survivors. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2018; 24: 287–296.
[35] Saeed W. The relationship of depression and quality of life with mediating role of death anxiety, silver lining and religious coping among women cancer patients in Pakistan. Frontiers in Oncology. 2025; 15: 1489169.
[36] Caldiroli CL, Sarandacchi S, Tomasuolo M, Diso D, Castiglioni M, Procaccia R. Resilience as a mediator of quality of life in cancer patients in healthcare services. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15: 8599.
[37] Soria-Reyes LM, Alarcón R, Cerezo MV, Blanca MJ. Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21) in women with breast cancer. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14: 20473.
[38] Mishel MH. Uncertainty in illness. Image—The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1988; 20: 225–232.
[39] Kang YH. A critical review of literature: mid-range nursing theory of uncertainty in illness. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2003; 15: 146–153.
[40] Ko E, Lee Y. The effects of coping strategies between uncertainty and quality of life of Korean women with gynecological cancer: evaluation of uncertainty in illness theory and stress and coping theory. Advances in Nursing Science. 2024; 47: E84–E95.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Top