Article Data

  • Views 3146
  • Dowloads 163

Original Research

Open Access

Stem cells in ductal breast cancer: immunohistochemical expression of CD44, CD24, CD133, and ALDH-1 markers in 104 cases

  • D. Korfias1,*,
  • J. Contis2
  • M. Frangou-Plemenou3
  • K. Gennatas4
  • A. Kondis5
  • D. Vlachodimitropoulos6

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,“Metaxa Anti-Cancer Hospital”, Piraeus (Greece)

2Department of Surgery, 2nd Surgical Clinic, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens (Greece)

3Pathology Department, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens (Greece)

4Department of Oncology, Athens Medical School, University of Athens (Greece)

5Department of Pathology, Athens Medical School, Athens (Greece)

6Department of Pathology, Athens Medical School, University of Athens, Athens (Greece)

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.01.4810 Vol.41,Issue 1,February 2020 pp.36-41

Published: 15 February 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): D. Korfias E-mail: dkorfias@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of stem cell markers CD44, CD24, CD133, and ALDH-1 in breast carcinomas and investigate any correlation with stage, degree of tumor differentiation, cell proliferation index, and hormone receptors status. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four cases of invasive ductal breast carcinomas were studied and classified according to grade and stage, hormonal status, and C-erbB2 expression. A semi-automatic Ventana method was used to examine by semi-quantitative method the immunohistochemical expression of anti-CD133, CD24, CD44, and ALDH1 antibodies. Results: CD44, CD24, and ALDH1 markers demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with higher disease stage and triple negative cancers (94%-55.5%). CD133 correlated with triple negative cancers (55.5%). No correlation with other clinical data or tumor differentiation was observed. Conclusion: Triple negative breast cancers express specific stem cell markers responsible for cell/stroma interaction and this is a useful tool in predicting tumor progression and developing specific targeted therapies.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Stem cells; CD44; CD24; CD133; ALDH1.

Cite and Share

D. Korfias,J. Contis,M. Frangou-Plemenou,K. Gennatas,A. Kondis, D. Vlachodimitropoulos. Stem cells in ductal breast cancer: immunohistochemical expression of CD44, CD24, CD133, and ALDH-1 markers in 104 cases. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(1);36-41.

References

[1] “WHO Classification of Tumors of the Breast”. (eds.) Lakhani S.R., Ellis I.O., Schnitt S.J., Tan P.H., van de Vijver M.J. Lyon: IARC Press, 2012, 4th ed, vol. 4.

[2] Fillmore C.M., Kuperwasser C.: “Human breast cancer cell lines con tain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically di verse progeny and survive chemotherapy”. Breast Cancer Res., 2008, 10, R25.

[3] Ponti D., Costa A., Zaffaroni N., Pratesi G., Petrangolini G., Coradini D., et al.: “Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell proper ties”. Cancer Res., 2005, 65, 5506.

[4] Wright M.H., Calcagno A.M., Salcido C.D., Carlson M.D., Ambudkar S.V., Varticovski L.: “Brca1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44+/CD24- and CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics”. Breast Cancer Res., 2008, 10, R10.

[5] Corti S., Locatelli F., Papadimitriou D., Donadoni C., Salani S., Del Bo R., et al.: “Identification of a primitive brain- derived neural stem cell population based on aldehyde dehydroge nase activity”. Stem Cells, 2006, 24, 975.

[6] Slamon D.J., Clark G.M., Wong S.G., Levin W.J., Ullrich A., McGuire W.L.: “Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with am plification of the HER-2/neu oncogene”. Science, 1987, 235, 177.

[7] Wicha M.S., Liu S., Dontu G.: “Cancer stem cells: an old idea-a para digm shift”. Cancer Res., 2006, 66, 1883.

[8] Bourguignon L.Y., Peyrollier K., Xia W., Gilad E.: “HyaluronanCD44 interaction activates stem cell marker Nanog, Stat-3-mediated MDR1 gene expression, and ankyrin-regulated multidrug efflux in breast and ovarian tumor cells”. J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283, 17635.

[9] Lacerda L., Pusztai L., Woodward W.A.: “The role of tumor initiating cells in drug resistance of breast cancer: implications for future therapeutic approaches”. Drug Resist. Updat., 2010, 13, 99.

[10] Croker A.K., Goodale D., Chu J., Postenka C., Hedley B.D., Hess D.A., et al.: “High aldehyde dehydrogenase and expression of cancer stem cell markers selects for breast cancer cells with enhanced malignant and metastatic ability”. J. Cell. Mol. Med., 2009, 13, 2236.

[11] Bourguignon L.Y., Gilad E., Peyrollier K.: “Heregulin-mediated ErbB2- ERK signaling activates hyaluronan synthases leading to CD44- dependent ovarian tumor cell growth and migration”. J. Bio. Chem., 2007, 282, 19426.

[12] Sheridan C., Kishimoto H., Fuchs R.K., Mehrotra S., Bhat-Nakshatri P., Turner C.H., et al.: “CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis”. Breast Cancer Res., 2006, 8, R59.

[13] Abraham B.K., Fritz P., McClellan M., Hauptvogel P., Athelogou M., Brauch H.: “Prevalence of CD44+/CD24-/low cells in breast cancer may not be associated with clinical outcome but may favor distant metastasis”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2005, 11, 1154.

[14] Charafe-Jauffret E., Ginestier C., lovino F., Tarpin C., Diebel M., EsterniB., et al.: “Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive cancer stem cells mediate metastasis and poor clinical outcome in inflammatory breast cancer”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2010, 16, 45.

[15] Neumeister V., Agarwal S., Bordeaux J., Camp R.L., Rimm D.L.: “In situ identification of putative cancer stem cells by multiplexing ALDH1, CD44, and cytokeratin identifies breast cancer patients with poor prognosis”. Am. J. Pathol., 2010, 176, 2131.

[16] Hermann P.C., Huber S.L., Herrler T., Aicher A., Ellwart J.W., Guba M., et al.: “Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer”. Cell Stem Cell, 2007, 1, 313.

[17] Jin L., Hope K.J., Zhai Q., Smadja-Joffe F., Dick J.E.: “Targeting of CD44 eradicates human acute myeloid leukemic stem cells”. Nat. Med., 2006, 12, 1167.

[18] Park S.O.Y., Lee H.E., Li H., Shipitsin M., Gelman R., Polyak K.: “Heterogeneity for stem cell-related markers according to tumor subtype and histologic stage in breast cancer”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2010, 16, 876.

[19] Platt V.M, Szoka F.C. Jr: “Anticancer therapeutics: targeting macromol ecules and nanocarriers to hyaluronan or CD44, a hyaluronan receptor”. Mol. Pharm., 2008, 5, 474.

[20] Kristiansen G.: “CD24 expression is a new prognostic marker in breast cancer”. Clin. Cancer Res., 2003, 9, 4906.

[21] Kristiansen G.: “CD24 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in non small cell cancer patients”. Br. J. Cancer, 2003, 8, 231.

[22] Kristiansen G.: “CD24 is expressed in ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Pathol., 2002, 161, 1215.

[23] Baumann P., Cremers N., Kroese F., Orend G., Chiquet-Ehrisman R., Uede T., et al.: “CD24 expression causes the acquisition of multiple cellular properties associated with tumor growth and metastasis”. Cancer Res., 2005, 65, 10783.

[24] LaBarge M.A., et Bissell M.J.: “Is CD133 a marker of metastatic colon cancer stem cells ?” J. Clin. Invest., 2008, 118, 2021.

[25] Wright M.H.: “BRCA1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44+/CD24-and CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics”. Breast Can-cer Res., 2008, 10, R10.

[26] Kim M.P., Fleming J.B., Wang H., Abbruzzese J.L., Choi W., Kopetz S., et al.: “ALDH activity selectively defines an enhanced tumor initiating cell population relative to CD 133 expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma”. PLoS One, 2011, 6, e20636.

[27] Al-Hajj M., Wicha M.S., Benito-Hernandez A., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F.: “Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 2003, 100, 3983. [28] Ginestier C., Liu S., Diebel M.E., Korkaya H., Luo M., Brown M.: “CXCR1 blockade selectively targets human breast can cer stem cells in vitro and in xenografts”. J. Clin. Invest., 2010, 120, 485.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top