Article Data

  • Views 757
  • Dowloads 113

Original Research

Open Access

Surgical complications and survival after pelvic exenteration: our experience following 60 procedures

  • M.E. Căpîlna1
  • B.Szabo1
  • J. Becsi1
  • M. Morariu1
  • M. Gheorghe1,*,
  • S.L. Kiss1
  • B. Moldovan2

1First Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Târgu-Mureş

2Department of Surgery, “St. Constantin” Hospital, Braşov (Romania)

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.02.5040 Vol.41,Issue 2,April 2020 pp.171-175

Published: 15 April 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Gheorghe E-mail: mihai18go@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: Analyse the results of pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies in a tertiary referral center. Materials and methods: Between 2011 and 2018, 60 patients underwent a pelvic exenteration. The indications were cervical (44 patients), vaginal (4), recurrent ovarian (6), endometrial (2), vulval (2), recurrent sigmoid colon (1), and bladder cancer (1). Results: Out of the 60 exenterations, 31 were total, 21 anterior, and 8 posterior. A Bricker non-continent ileal or sigmoid urinary conduit was performed in 51 out of 52 anterior and total exenterations. Early complications occurred in 34 patients of whom four perioperative deaths (6.6 %). Among the 60 patients, at this moment, 33 are alive, 25 are dead, and two are lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or advanced pelvic malignancies can be associated with long-term survival and even cure without high perioperative mortality in properly selected patients. However, postoperative complications can be lethal.

Keywords

Complications; Pelvic exenteration; Survival.

Cite and Share

M.E. Căpîlna,B.Szabo,J. Becsi,M. Morariu,M. Gheorghe,S.L. Kiss,B. Moldovan. Surgical complications and survival after pelvic exenteration: our experience following 60 procedures. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(2);171-175.

References

[1] Brunschwig A.: “Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma: a one-stage abdominoperineal operation with end colostomy and bilateral ureteral implantation into the colon above the colostomy”. Cancer, 1948, 1, 177.

[2] Graves S., Seagle B.L., Strohl A.E., Shahabi S., Nieves-Neira W.: “Survival after pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer: A National Cancer Database Study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2017, 27, 1610.

[3] Saunders N.: “Pelvic exenteration: by whom and for whom?” Lancet, 1995, 345, 5.

[4] Schmidt A.M., Imesch P., Fink D., Egger H.: “Pelvic exenterations for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes of 40 patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2016, 26, 716.

[5] Khoury-Collado F., Einstein M.H., Bochner B.H., Alektiar K.M., Sonoda Y., Abu-Rustum N.R., et al.: “Pelvic exenteration with curative intent for recurrent uterine malignancies”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 124, 42.

[6] Fotopoulou C., Neumann U., Kraetschell R., Schefold J.C., Weidemann H., Lichtenegger W., Sehouli J.: “Long-term clinical outcome of pelvic exenteration in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2010, 101, 507.

[7] Chiantera V., Rossi M., De Iaco P., Koehler C., Marnitz S., Gallotta V., et al.: “Morbidity after pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: a retrospective multicentric study of 230 patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2014, 24, 156.

[8] Houvenaeghel G., Moutardier V., Karsenty G., Bladou F., Lelong B., Buttarelli M., Delpero J.R.: “Major complications of urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a 23- year mono-institutional experience in 124 patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2004, 92, 680.

[9] Berek J.S., Howe C., Lagasse L.D., Hacker N.F.: “Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: survival and morbidity analysis of the 45-year experience at UCLA”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2005, 99, 153.

[10] Sharma S., Odunsi K., Driscoll D., Lele S.: “Pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies: twenty-year experience at Rosewell Park Cancer Institute”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2005, 15, 475.

[11] Park J.Y., Choi H.J., Jeong S.Y., Park J.Y., Choi H.J., Jeong S.Y.: “The role of pelvic exenteration and reconstruction for treatment of advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies: analysis of risk factors predicting recurrence and survival”. J. Surg. Oncol., 2007, 96, 560.

[12] Caceres A., Mourton S.M., Bochner B.H., Gerst S.R., Liu L., Alektiar K.M., et al.: “Extended pelvic resections for recurrent uterine and cervical cancer: out-of-the-box surgery”. Int. J. Gynecol., 2008, 18, 1139.

[13] Maggioni A., Roviglione G., Landoni F., Zanagnolo V., Peiretti M., Colombo N., et al.: “Pelvic exenteration: ten-year experience at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 114, 64.

[14] Schmidt A.M., Imesch P., Fink D., Egger H.: “Indications and longterm clinical outcomes in 282 patients with pelvic exenteration foradvanced or recurrent cervical cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 604.

[15] McLean K.A., Zhang W., Dunsmoor-Su R.F., Shah C.A., Gray H.J., Swensen R.E., Goff B.A.: “Pelvic exenteration in the age of modern chemoradiation”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 131.

[16] Baiocchi G., Guimaraes G.C., Rosa Oliveira R.A., Kumagai L.Y., Faloppa C.C., Aguiar S., et al.: “Prognostic factors in pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies”. Eur. J. Cancer Surg., 2012, 38, 948.

[17] Jager L., Nilsson P.J., Floter Radestad A.: “Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancy. A Study of 28 Consecutive Patients at a Single Institution”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 755.

[18] Ungar L., Palfalvi L., Novak Z.: “Primary pelvic exenteration in cervical cancer patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 111, S9.

[19] Magrina J.F., Stanhope C.R., Waever A.L.: “Pelvic exenterations: supralevator, infralevator, and with vulvectomy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1997, 64, 13.

[20] Chiva L.M., Lapuente F., González-Cortijo L.: “Surgical treatment of recurrent cervical cancer: State of the art and new achievements”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 110, S60.

[21] Bricker E.M.: “Bladder substitution for pelvic evisceration”. Surg. Clin. North Am., 1950, 30, 1511.

[22] Ungar L., Palfalvi L.: “Pelvic exenteration without external urinary or fecal diversion in gynecological cancer patients”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2006, 16, 364.

[23] Ungar L., Palfalvi L.: “Surgical treatment of lymph node metastases in stage IB cervical cancer: The laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP) procedure”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2003, 13, 647.

[24] Palfalvi L., Ungar L.: “Laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP), the technique for radical pelvic side wall dissection: Feasibility, technique and results”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2003, 13, 914.

[25] Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A.: “Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey”. Ann. Surg., 2004, 240, 205.

[26] Höckel M., Dornhofer N.: “Review: Pelvic exenteration for gynaecological tumours: achievements and unanswered questions”. Lancet Oncol., 2006, 7, 837.

[27] Friedlander M., Grogan M.: “Guidelines for the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer”. Oncologist, 2002, 7, 342.

[28] Höckel M.: “Laterally extended endopelvic resection. Novel surgical treatment of locally recurrent cervical carcinoma involving the pelvic side wall”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003, 91, 369.

[29] Höckel M., Wolf B., Hentschel B., Horn L.C.: “Surgical treatment and histopathological assessment of advanced cervicovaginal carcinoma: A prospective study and retrospective analysis”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2017, 70, 99.

[30] Căpîlna M.E., Moldovan B., Szabo B.: “Pelvic exenteration - our initial experience in 15 cases”. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2015, 36, 142.

[31] Dessole M., Petrillo M., Lucidi A., Naldini A., Rossi M., De Iaco P., et al.: “Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies: A Multicentric Study”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2018, 28, 267.

[32] de Wilt J.H., van Leeuwen D.H., Logmans A., Verhoef C., Kirkels W.J., Vermaas M., Ansink A.C.: “Pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent gynecological malignancies”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2007, 134, 243.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top