Article Data

  • Views 731
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

The effect of six scheduled cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer

  • H. Ishibashi1
  • M. Miyamoto1,*,
  • T. Aoyama1
  • H. Soyama1
  • H. Matsuura1
  • H. Iwahashi1
  • M. Takano2
  • K. Furuya1

1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama, Tokorozawa, Japan

2Departments of Clinical Oncology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Saitama, Tokorozawa, Japan

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.03.5102 Vol.41,Issue 3,June 2020 pp.386-390

Submitted: 14 December 2018 Accepted: 14 February 2019

Published: 15 June 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): M. Miyamoto E-mail: morikazu1118@hotmail.co.jp

Abstract

urpose: This study evaluated the appropriate number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before interval debulking surgery (IDS) in advanced ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Cases with advanced ovarian cancer who received a combination of taxane and platinum as NAC and IDS at this institution between 2001 to 2016 were identified. The cases were divided into two groups; patients who received six or four scheduled cycles of NAC (groups A and B, respectively). Results: Thirty-six cases were in group A and 35 cases in group B. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in group A were better than those in group B (p = 0.01, < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, six scheduled cycles of NAC was an independent better prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.56, p = 0.04) and OS (HR, 0.39; p = 0.01). Conclusion: In advanced ovarian cancer, six scheduled cycles of NAC demonstrated a better prognosis.

Keywords

Ovarian carcinoma; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Primary debulking surgery; Interval debulking surgery

Cite and Share

H. Ishibashi, M. Miyamoto,T. Aoyama,H. Soyama,H. Matsuura,H. Iwahashi, M. Takano, K. Furuya. The effect of six scheduled cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(3);386-390.

References

[1] Permuth­Wey J., Sellers T.A.: “Epidemiology of ovarian cancer”. Methods. Mol. Biol. 2009, 472, 413.

[2] Heintz A.P., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Benedet J.L., Creasman W.T., et al.: “Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2006, 95, S161.

[3] Cannistra SA.: “Cancer of the ovary”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2004, 351, 2531.

[4] Colombo P.E., Mourregot A., Fabbro M., Gutowski M., Saint­ Aubert B., Quenet F., et al.: “Aggressive surgical strategies in ad­ vanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009, 35, 135.

[5] Bristow R.E., Tomacruz R.S., Armstrong D.K., Trimble E.L., Montz F.J.: “Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta­ analysis”. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 1248.

[6] Chang S.J., Bristow R.E., Ryu H.S.: “Impact of complete cytore­ duction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2012, 19, 4059.

[7] du Bois A., Reuss A., Pujade­Lauraine E., Harter P., Ray­Coquard I., Pfisterer J.: “Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analy­ sis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO­OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO)”. Cancer, 2009, 115, 1234.

[8] Vergote I., Tropé C.G., Amant F., Kristensen G.B., Ehlen T., John­ son N., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 363, 943.

[9] Kehoe S., Hook J., Nankivell M., Jayson G.C., Kitchener H., Lopes T.: “Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly di­ agnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open­label, ran­domised, controlled, non­inferiority trial”. Lancet, 2015, 386, 249.

[10] Stoeckle E., Boubli B., Floquet A., Brouste V., Sire M., Croce S., et al.: “Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: yet to be defined?” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2011, 159, 407.

[11] da Costa Miranda V., de Souza Fêde Â.B., Dos Anjos C.H., da Silva J.R., Sanchez F.B., da Silva Bessa L.R., et al.: “Neoadju­ vant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: Safety and effectiveness”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 287.

[12] Kang S., Nam B.H.: “Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase op­ timal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovarian cancer? Meta­analysis of 21 studies”. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 2009, 16, 2315.

[13] Colombo P.E., Labaki M., Fabbro M., Bertrand M., Mourregot A., Gutowski M., et al.: “Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles prior to interval surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 135, 223.

[14] da Costa Miranda V., de Souza Fêde Â.B., Dos Anjos C.H., da Silva J.R., Sanchez F.B., da Silva Bessa L.R., et al.: “Neoadju­ vant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: Safety and effectiveness”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 287.

[15] Hazelton D., Nicosia R.F., Nicosia S.V.: “Vascular endothelial growth factor levels in ovarian cyst fluid correlate with malig­ nancy”. Clin. Cancer. Res., 1999, 5, 823.

[16] Burger R.A., Brady M.F., Bookman M.A., Fleming G.F., Monk B.J., Huang H., et al.: “Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 2473.

[17] Klauber N., Parangi S., Flynn E., Hamel E., D’Amato R.J.: “Inhi­ bition of angiogenesis and breast cancer in mice by the microtubule inhibitors 2­methoxyestradiol and taxol”. Cancer. Res., 1997, 57, 81.

[18] Markman M., Liu P.Y., Wilczynski S., Monk B., Copeland L.J., Alvarez R.D., et al.: “Phase III randomized trial of 12 versus 3 months of maintenance paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovar­ ian cancer after complete response to platinum and paclitaxel­based chemotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic On­ cology Group trial”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2003, 21, 2460.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top