Article Data

  • Views 707
  • Dowloads 143

Original Research

Open Access

The outcomes of fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer

  • Emine Karabuk1
  • Burak Karadag2,*,
  • Ceyda Karadag3
  • M. Faruk Kose4
  • M. Murat Naki4
  • E. Nilufer Guler5

1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Acıbadem University, Atakent Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey

3Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey

4Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Acıbadem University, Atakent Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

5Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.03.5147 Vol.41,Issue 3,June 2020 pp.391-395

Submitted: 07 January 2019 Accepted: 01 April 2019

Published: 15 June 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Burak Karadag E-mail: drburakkaradag@gmail.com

Abstract

Conservative surgery has long been discussed as a treatment option in women with ovarian cancer at reproductive age. However, current guidelines recommend conservative surgery only in selected patients. There is considerable interest on pregnancy and delivery rates after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS), with several ongoing studies on this subject. The aim of the present multi-center study was to evaluate survival and pregnancy outcomes in patients that underwent fertility-sparing surgery. This retrospective study included 19 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery due to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer between 2002 and 2014. The median duration of follow-up was 59.5 months (range 10-152 months). A total of 10 full-term pregnancies and 3 spontaneous abortions occurred in 7 patients (36.8%) following FSS. Ten patients (52.6%) underwent prophylactic surgery after a median period of 49 months (16-119 months), while 2 patients (10.5%) developed recurrent disease after prophylactic surgery. Accurate staging in patients with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer and regular follow-up has shown promising reproductive outcomes. In light of the current data, fertility-sparing surgery should be considered in selected patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. There is still no consensus, however, on the selection criteria of eligible patients for fertility-sparing surgery.

Keywords

Epithelial ovarian cancer; Fertility-sparing surgery; Surgical staging

Cite and Share

Emine Karabuk, Burak Karadag,Ceyda Karadag,M. Faruk Kose, M. Murat Naki,E. Nilufer Guler. The outcomes of fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(3);391-395.

References

[1] Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Smigal C., et al.: “Cancer statistics, 2006”. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2006, 56,106.

[2] McGuire W.P., Hoskins W.J., Brady M.F., Kucera P.R., Partridge E.E., Look K.Y., et al.: “Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 1996, 334, 1.

[3] FIGO cancer committee. Staging announcement. Gynecol. Oncol., 1986, 50, 383.

[4] Low J., Perrin L.C., Crandon A.J., Hacker N.F.: “Conservative surgery to preserve ovarian function in patients with malignant ovar- ian germ cell tumors. A review of 74 cases”. Cancer, 2000, 89, 391.

[5] Brewer M., Gershenson D.M., Herzog C.E., Mitchell M.F., Silva E.G., Wharton J.T.: “Outcome and reproductive function after chemotherapy for ovarian dysgerminoma”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1999, 17, 2670.

[6] Morice P., Camatte S., El Hassan J., Pautier P., Duvillard P., Cas- taigne D.: “Clinical outcomes and fertility after conservative treatment of ovarian borderline tumors”. Fertil. Steril., 2001, 75, 92.

[7] Duska L.R., Chang Y., Flynn C.E., Chen A.H., Goodman A., Fuller A.F., Nikrui N.: “Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in the reproductive age group”. Cancer, 1999, 85, 2623.

[8] Plaxe S.C., Braly P.S., Freddo J.L., McClay E., Kirmani S., Howell S.B.: “Profiles of women age 30–39 and age less than 30 with epithelial ovarian cancer”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1993, 81, 651.

[9] Rodriguez M., Nguyen H.N., Averette H.E., Steren A.J., Penalver M.A., HarrisonT., et al.: “National survey of ovarian carcinoma XII. Epithelial ovarian malignancies in women less than or equal to 25 years of age”. Cancer, 1994, 73, 1245.

[10] Swerenton K.D., Hislop T.G., Spinelli J., LeRiche J.C., Yang N., Boyes D.A.: “Ovarian carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prog- nostic factors”. Obstet. Gynecol., 1985, 65, 264.

[11] Smedley H., Sikora K.: “Age as a prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian carcinoma”. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1985, 92, 839.

[12] Di Saia P.J.: “Fertility-sparing treatment of patients with ovarian cancer”. Comprehens Ther., 1990, 16, 35.

[13] Borgfeldt C., Iosif C., Masback A.: “Fertility-sparing surgery and outcome in fertile women with ovarian borderline tumors and epithelial invasive ovarian cancer”. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 2007, 134, 110.

[14] Fruscio R., Corso S., Ceppi L., Garavaglia D., Garbi A., Floriani I., et al.: “Conservative management of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, results of a large retrospective series”. Ann. Oncol., 2013, 24, 138.

[15] Kajiyama H., Shibata K., Mizuno M., Nawa A., Mizuno K., Mat- suzawa K., et al.: “Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 122, 334.

[16] Kwon Y.S., Hahn H.S., Kim T.J., Lee I.H., Lim K.T., Lee K.H., et al.: “Fertility preservation in patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 20, 44.

[17] Morice P., Leblanc E., Rey A., Baron M., Querleu D., Blanchot J., et al.: “Conservative treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a multicentre study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer) and SFOG (Societe Francaised’ Oncologie Gynecologique)”. Hum. Reprod, 2005, 20, 1379.

[18] Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Suh D.S., Kim J.H., Kim Y.M., Kim Y.T., et al.: “Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: oncologic safety and reproductive outcomes”. Gy- necol. Oncol., 2008, 110, 345.

[19] Satoh T., Hatae M., Watanabe Y., Yaegashi N., Ishiko O., Kodama S., et al.: “Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposal for patient selection”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2010, 28, 1727.

[20] Schilder J.M., Thompson A.M., DePriest P.D., Ueland F.R., Cibull M.L., Kryscio R.J., et al.: “Outcome of reproductive age women with stage IA or IC invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing therapy”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2002, 87, 1.

[21] Zanetta G., Chiari S., Rota S., Bratina G., Maneo A., Torri V., et al.: “Conservative surgery for stage I ovarian carcinoma in women of child bearing age”. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1997, 104, 1030.

[22] National Comprehensive Cancer Center: “Ovarian cancer clin- ical practice guidelines in oncology. Fort Washington: Na- tional Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2016”. Available at: http://www.nccn.org.

[23] Wright J.D., Shah M., Mathew L., Burke W.M., Culhane J., Goldman N, et al.: “Fertility preservation in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer”. Cancer, 2009, 115, 4118.

[24] Meier W.J.: “Lympnadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer”. Proc. Am Sco Clin Oncol 2000, 19, 1541.

[25] Benedetti-Panici P., Greggi S., Maneschi F., Scambia G., Amoroso M., Rabitti C., et al.: “Anatomical and pathological study of retroperitoneal nodes in epithelial ovarian cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1993, 51, 150.

[26] Petru E., Lahousen M., Tamussino K., Pickel H., Stranzl H., Stettner H., et al.: “Lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1994, 170, 656.

[27] Baiocchi G., Raspagliesi F., Grosso G., Fontanelli R., Cobellis L., Di Re E.: “Early ovarian cancer: is there a role for systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy”? Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 1998, 8, 103.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top