Article Data

  • Views 749
  • Dowloads 133

Original Research

Open Access

Clear-cell carcinoma of the endometriu type I or type II endometrial carcinoma?

  • Jingyuan Wang1
  • Xiaoping Li1
  • Danhua Shen2
  • Xiao Wang3
  • Zhiqi Wang1,*,
  • Jianliu Wang1

1Gynecology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

2Pathology Department, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China

3Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health (Peking University), Beijing, China

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.03.5245 Vol.41,Issue 3,June 2020 pp.449-454

Submitted: 21 April 2019 Accepted: 25 June 2019

Published: 15 June 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Zhiqi Wang E-mail: wangzqnet@sina.com

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: To determine if clear cell carcinoma (CCC) should be classified as a type I or type II carcinoma and provide guidance for clinical treatment. Material and Methods: This study included three groups of endometrial carcinomas: 92 cases of CCC were collected from 22 hospitals in China from January 2003 to November 2014, 272 cases of EMA were collected from Peking University People’s Hospital from February 2003 and July 2016, and 192 cases of USC were collected from 22 hospitals in China from February 2001 to December 2014. The 2009 FIGO staging system was used and information concerning clinicopathological features was collected. Results: The mean age in the CCC and USC groups was higher than that of the EMA group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the FIGO Stage between the CCC and EMA groups (p = 0.158). There was no significant difference in the extent of myometrial invasion between the three groups (p = 0.064), but there was a significant difference in cervical involvement, adnexal metastasis, and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The patients in the CCC, EMA, and USC groups were followed up for an average of 105.6 ± 7.5 months, 135.0 ± 2.2 months, and 92.1 ± 4.4 months, respectively. Fourteen cases with CCC recurred, and 13 ended in death. There was no significant difference between the CCC and the EMA groups in recurrence and death rates (p = 0.035 > 0.0167, p = 0.018 > 0.0167, 0.0167 = 0.05/3), but the prognosis in the USC group was worse. Conclusions: CCC may follow an overlapping or a third pathway of carcinogenesis, rather than belong to the type II carcinogenesis. Therefore, if CCC should be classified as a type I or type II carcinoma is yet to be determined. Additional studies of the clinicopathological features underlying CCC will facilitate more elective management and avoid unnecessary or non-elective treatments.

Keywords

Clear-cell carcinoma; Clinicopathological features; Prognosis

Cite and Share

Jingyuan Wang,Xiaoping Li,Danhua Shen,Xiao Wang, Zhiqi Wang,Jianliu Wang. Clear-cell carcinoma of the endometriu type I or type II endometrial carcinoma?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(3);449-454.

References

[1] Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., et al.,: “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. Int. J.Cancer, 2015, 136, 359.

[2] Bokhman, J.V.: “Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1983, 15, 10.

[3] Abeler V.M., Kjorstad K.E.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the en- dometrium: a histopathological and clinical study of 97 cases”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1991, 40, 2077.

[4] Mendivil A., Schuler K.M., Gehrig P.A.: “Non-endometrioid ade- nocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a review of selected histological subtypes”. Cancer Control, 2009, 16, 46.

[5] Murphy K.T., Rotmensch J., Yamada S.D., Mundt A.J.: “Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic stages I–IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Bio. Phy., 2003, 55, 1272.

[6] Abeler V.M., Vergote I.B., Kjørstad K.E., Tropé C.G.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium. Prognosis and metastatic pattern”. Cancer, 1996, 78, 1740.

[7] Webb G.A., Lagios M.D.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1987, 156, 1486.

[8] Jaishuen A., Kunakornporamat K., Viriyapak B., Benjapibal M., Chaopotong P., Petsuksiri J., Therasakvichya S.: “Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Non-endometrioid Carcinoma of Endometrium: Siriraj Hospital Experience”. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 2014, 15, 2905.

[9] DeLair D.F., Burke K.A., Selenica P., Lim R.S., Scott S.N., Middha S., et al.: “The genetic landscape of endometrial clear cell carcinomas”. J. Pathol., 2017, 243, 230.

[10] Kurman R.J., Scully R.E.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the en- dometrium: an analysis of 21 cases”. Cancer, 1976, 37, 872.

[11] Benediktsdottir K.R., Jonasson J.G., Hallgrimsson J.: “Tumors in Iceland. 12. Malignant tumours of the corpus of the uterus. A histological classification, epidemiological considerations and survival”. Apmis., 1989, 97, 781.

[12] Olawaiye A.B., Boruta D.M.: “Management of women with clear cell endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 113, 277.

[13] Abeler V.M.,Kjorstad K.E.: “Endometrial adenocarcinoma in Norway. A study of a total population”. Cancer., 1991, 67, 3093.

[14] Glasspool R.M., McNeish I.A.: “Clear cell carcinoma of ovary and uterus”. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 2013, 15, 566.

[15] Kulhan M., Kulhan G., Nayki U., Nayki C., Ulug P., Sipahi M., et al.: “Assessment of clinicopathological features, evaluation of treatment, and prognosis of clear cell and serous papillary endometrial carcinoma”. Ginekol. Pol., 2016, 87, 570.

[16] Prueksaritanond N., Chantape W.: “Comparative Survival Outcomes of Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma, Clear Cell Carcinoma, Grade 3 Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, and Carcinosarcoma of Endometrial Cancer in Rajavithi Hospital”. J. Med. Assoc. Thai., 2016, 99, S75.

[17] Abdulfatah E., Sakr S., Thomas S., Al-Wahab Z., Mutch DG., Dowdy S., et al.: “Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: Evaluation of Prognostic Parameters in a Multi-institutional Cohort of 165 Cases”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2017, 27, 1714.

[18] Ju B., Wang J., Yang B., Sun L., Guo Y., Hao Q.: “Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Endometrium and Cervix in Comparison to Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma”. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2018, 37, 388.

[19] Moriya T., Kanomata N.: “Pathology of endometrial carcinoma”. 2014. 46.

[20] Bae H.S., Kim H., Young Kwon S., Kim K.R., Song J.Y., Kim I.: “Should endometrial clear cell carcinoma be classified as Type II endometrial carcinoma”? Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 2015, 34, 74.

[21] Yasuda M.: “Immunohistochemical characterization of endometrial carcinomas: endometrioid, serous and clear cell adenocarcinomas in association with genetic analysis”. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2014, 40, 2167.

[22] Smith R.S., Kapp D.S., Chen Q., Teng N.N.: “Treatment of high-risk uterine cancer with whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2000, 48, 767.

[23] Giri P.G., Schneider V., Belgrad R.: “Clear cell carcinoma of the endometrium: an uncommon entity with a favorable prognosis”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 1981, 7, 1383.

[24] Murphy K.T., Rotmensch J., Yamada S.D., Mundt A.J. “Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic stages I-IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy”. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2003, 55,1272.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top