Article Data

  • Views 688
  • Dowloads 162

Original Research

Open Access

Sequential Chemoradiation versus Radiation for the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterus

  • Yu Hui Lim1,*,
  • Sheow Lei Lim1
  • Linda Xiao Hui Lin1
  • Lay Tin Soh2
  • Hoon Seng Khoo Tan2
  • Richard Ming Chert Yeo2
  • Timothy Yong Kuei Lim1

1Department of Gynaecological Oncology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

2National Cancer Centre, Singapore

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.05.5448 Vol.41,Issue 5,October 2020 pp.705-712

Submitted: 16 October 2019 Accepted: 17 April 2020

Published: 15 October 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Yu Hui Lim E-mail: lim.yu.hui@singhealth.com.sg

Abstract

Purpose of Investigation: The optimal adjuvant therapy for women with Stage III endometrial cancer following surgical staging is controversial. Post-operative sequential chemotherapy followed by external beam radiotherapy is the standard treatment for Stage III uterine cancer at our institution since 2006. We aim to analyse the survival outcomes in this group of patients comparing with the historical group of patients who received radiation only. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective single-institution analysis of patients with surgical Stage III endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus treated at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital from 2000 to 2010. Results: Ninety-six patients with surgical Stage III endometrioid endometrial cancer who received postoperative adjuvant therapies were identified; 43% (n = 41) received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, 57% (n = 55) received radiotherapy only. The 2 groups were well balanced with regard to age, ECOG performance status, tumour size, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, peritoneal cytology status and debulking status. At a median follow up of 62.5 months (range: 4 -164), the 5-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different. Following adjustment for age, disease stage, tumour grade, residual disease, tumour size and nodal status, the adjusted hazard ratios for DFS, CSS and OS for those treated with chemoradiation were not significantly better than those treated with radiation only. Conclusion: In this single institution retrospective analysis of Asian patients with surgical Stage III endometrioid endometrial cancer, there was a trend towards sequential chemotherapy followed by radiation having better OS and CSS over radiation alone but this did not reach statistical significance.


Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy.


Cite and Share

Yu Hui Lim,Sheow Lei Lim,Linda Xiao Hui Lin,Lay Tin Soh,Hoon Seng Khoo Tan,Richard Ming Chert Yeo,Timothy Yong Kuei Lim. Sequential Chemoradiation versus Radiation for the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterus. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(5);705-712.

References

[1] Torre L.A, Brey F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A.: “Global cancer statistics, 2012”. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015, 65, 87- 108.

[2] Creasman W., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M., Beller U., Benedet J., et al.: “Carcinoma of the Corpus Uteri”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2006, 95, S105-S143.

[3] Hernandez E.: “Endometrial Adenocrcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North am., 2001, 28, 743-757.

[4] Greer B.E., Hamberger A.D.: “Treatment of intraperitoneal metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium by the whole-abdomen moving-strip technique and pelvic boost irradiation”. Gynecol. Oncol., 1983, 16, 365-373.

[5] Greven K.M., Randall M.E., Lanciano R.M., Corn B., Case D.: “Pathologic stage III endometrial carcinoma. Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence”. Cancer, 1993, 71, 3697-3702.

[6] Randall M.E., Filiaci V.L., Muss H., Spirtos N.M., Mannel R.S, Fowler J., et al. Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (2006) Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation vs chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol., 24: 36–44

[7] Hogberg T., Signorelli M., de Oliveira C.F., Fossati R., Lissoni A. A., Sorbe B., et al.: “Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer–Results from two randomised studies”. Eur. J. Cancer, 2010, 46, 2422-2431.

[8] Levine D.A., The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network: “Inte-grated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma”. Nature, 2013, 497, 67-73.

[9] Jobsen J.J, Naudin Ten Cate L., Lybeert L.M.L, Scholten A., van der Steen-Banasik E. M., van der Palen J., et al. “Outcome of Endometrial Cancer Stage IIIA with Adnexal or Serosal Involvement Only”. Obs and Gynecol Intl., 2011, 2011,

[10] Klopp A.H., Jhingran A., Ramondetta L., Lu K., Gershenson D.M., Eifel P.J.: “Node-positive adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: Outcome and patterns of recurrence with and without external beam irradiation”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 6-11.

[11] Lee L.J., Viswanathan A.N.: “Combined chemotherapy and radia-tion improves survival for node-positive endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 127, 32-37.

[12] Secord A.A., Geller M.A., Broadwater G., Holloway R., Shuler K., Dao N., et al.: “A multicenter evaluation of adjuvant therapy in women with optimally resected stage IIIC endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 128, 65-70.

[13] ALVAREZSECORD A., HAVRILESKY L., BAEJUMP V., CHIN J., CALINGAERT B., BLAND A., et al.: “The role of multi-modality adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in women with advanced stage endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2007, 107, 285-291.

[14] Lum M.M., Belnap T.W., Frandsen J., Brown A.P., Sause W.T., Soisson A.P., et al.: “Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients With FIGO Stage IIIA Endometrial Cancer”. am. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015, 38, 283-288.

[15] Boruta D.M., Gehrig P.A., Fader A.N., Olawaiye A.B.: “Management of women with uterine papillary serous cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2009, 115, 142- 153.

[16] de Boer S.M, Powell M.E, Mileshkin L., Katsaros D., Bessette P., Haie-Meder C.: “Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label multicentre, randomized, phase 3 trial”. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19(3), 295-309.

[17] Yoon M.S., Park W., Huh S.J., Kim H.J., Kim Y.S., Kim Y.B., et al.: “A multicenter analysis of adjuvant therapy after surgery for stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group study (KROG 13-17)”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 138, 519-525.

[18] Lu S.M., Chang-Halpenny C., Hwang-Graziano J.: “Sequential versus “sandwich” sequencing of adjuvant chemoradiation for the treat-ment of stage III unterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2015, 137, 28-33.

[19] Onal C., Sari S.Y., Yildirim B.A., Yavas G., Gultekin M., Guler O. C., et al.: “A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma”. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 2019, 30,

[20] Greven K., Winter K., Underhill K., Fontenesci J., Cooper J., Burke T.: “Final analysis of RTOG 9708: Adjuvant postoperative irradiation combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 155-159.

[21] Milgrom S.A., Kollmeier M.A., Abu-Rustum N.R., Tew W.P., Sonoda Y., Barakat R.R., et al.: “Postoperative external beam radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel for stage III (FIGO 2009) endometrial cancer”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2013, 130, 436-440.

[22] Talhouk A., McConechy M.K., Leung S., Yang W., Lum A., Senz J., et al.: “Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomic-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer”. Cancer, 2017, 123, 802-813.

[23] Stelloo E., Nout R.A., Osse E.M.: “Improved risk assessment by integrating molecular and clinicopathological factors in early-stage endometrial cancer–combined analysis of PORTEC cohorts”. Clin Cancer Res, 2016, 22, 4215-4224.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top