Article Data

  • Views 695
  • Dowloads 127

Original Research

Open Access

What Do Relatives of Turkish Women with Ovarian Cancer Share on Websites? : A Qualitative Research

  • Buse Güler1,*,
  • Merve Çamlıbel2
  • Samiye Mete3

1Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Turkey

2Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey

3İstinye University Faculty of Health Sciences, Turkey

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.05.5459 Vol.41,Issue 5,October 2020 pp.732-738

Submitted: 23 December 2019 Accepted: 06 May 2020

Published: 15 October 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Buse Güler E-mail: busebahitli@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: To purpose of this study was to examine the interpretations shared by patient relatives on websites. Materials and Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. We used an online search engine, Google, and performed a search utilizing the terms ‘ovarian cancer, ‘sharing’, ‘experience’ between 2009-2019 to determine the sample, and 78 shares were included. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Qualitative analysis revealed four themes: (1) cancer perception, (2) reactions during the disease period, (3) difficulties during the diagnosis and treatment period, and (4) coping strategies. It was determined that caregivers of women with ovarian cancer had a negative perception of the disease, had more emotional reactions, had unmet needs, and examined alternative/complementary medicine practices. Conclusions: This study provided information about the experiences of relatives of women with ovarian cancer during the diagnosis and treatment process.


Keywords

Ovarian cancer; Caregiver; Website.


Cite and Share

Buse Güler,Merve Çamlıbel,Samiye Mete. What Do Relatives of Turkish Women with Ovarian Cancer Share on Websites? : A Qualitative Research. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(5);732-738.

References

[1] Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L. A., Je-mal A.: “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries”. Ca. Cancer J. Clin., 2019, 68394-424.

[2] Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. (2018). Avail-able at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/istatistik/Trkiye_Kanser_statistikleri_2015.pdf (Accessed 20 February 2018).

[3] Hand L.C., Thomas T.H., Belcher S., Campbell G., Lee Y.J., Roberge M., et al.: “Caregiving Is a Marathon, Not a Road Race: Reenvisioning Caregiver Support Services in Gynecologic Oncology”. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2018, 28, 1722-1727.

[4] Beesley V.L., Alemayehu C., Webb P.M.: “A systematic literature review of the prevalence of and risk factors for supportive care needs among women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers”. Support. Care Cancer, 2018, 26, 701-710.

[5] Teskereci G., Kulakaç O.: “Life experiences of caregivers of women with gynaecological cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review”. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.), 2018, 27, e12456.

[6] Ofran Y., Paltiel O., Pelleg D., Rowe J.M., Yom-Tov E.: “Patterns of Information-Seeking for Cancer on the Internet: An Analysis of Real World Data”. Plos one, 2012, 7, e45921.

[7] Levenson J.L., Chafe W., Flanagan P.: “Factitious Ovarian Cancer: Feigning via Resources on the Internet”. Psychosomatics, 2007, 48, 71- 73.

[8] Russ H., Giveon S.M., Catarivas M.G., Yaphe J.: “The effect of the Internet on the patient-doctor relationship from the patient’s perspective: a survey from primary care”. the Israel Medical Association Journal : IMAJ, 2011, 13, 220-224.

[9] Kinnane N.A., Milne D.J.: “The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review”. Support. Care Cancer, 2010, 18, 1123-1136.

[10] Lapid M.I., Atherton P.J., Clark M.M., Kung S., Sloan J.A., Rummans T.A.: “Cancer Caregiver: Perceived Benefits of Technology”. Telemedicine and E-Health, 2015, 21, 893-902.

[11] Petricone-Westwood D., Lebel S.: “Being a caregiver to patients with ovarian cancer: A scoping review of the literature”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 143, 184-192.

[12] Jayde V., White K., Blomfield P.: “Symptoms and diagnostic delay in ovarian cancer: A summary of the literature”. Contemp. Nurse, 2010, 34, 55-65.

[13] Jasen P.: “From the “Silent Killer” to the “Whispering Disease”: Ovarian Cancer and the Uses of Metaphor”. Med. Hist., 2009, 53, 489- 512.

[14] Markman M.: “Ovarian Cancer Survival: Steady Improvement, Despite Rhetoric to the Contrary”. Curr. Oncol. Rep., 2013, 15, 433-435.

[15] Koldjeski D., Kirkpatrick M.K., Everett L., Brown S., Swanson M.: “The Ovarian Cancer Journey of Families the First Postdiagnostic Year”. Cancer Nurs., 2007, 30, 232-242.

[16] Ferrell B., Ervin K., Smith S., Marek T., Melancon C.: “Family Perspectives of Ovarian Cancer”. Cancer Pract., 2002, 10, 269-276.

[17] Butow P.N., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Price M. A., Bell M. L., Webb P. M., deFazio A., et al.: “Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: A longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 132, 690-697.

[18] Stilos K., Fitch M., Nolen A.E., DasGupta T., Sapsford M., McAn-drew A., et al.: “Exploration of Families’ Experiences Caring for Loved Ones With Advanced Ovarian Cancer”. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 2018, 20, 464-470.

[19] Hartnett J., Thom B., Kline N.: “Caregiver Burden in End-Stage Ovarian Cancer”. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs., 2016, 20, 169-173.

[20] Shilling V., Starkings R., Jenkins V., Fallowfield L.: “The pervasive nature of uncertainty—a qualitative study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers”. J. Cancer Surviv., 2017, 11, 590-603.

[21] Achimaş-Cadariu P., Iancu M., Kubelac P., Pop F., Braicu I., Vlad C., et al.: “Expectations and perspectives of ovarian cancer patients about cancer management in Romania. The international NOGGO-ENGOT trial: EXPRESSION III”. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.), 2017, 26, e12566.

[22] Guenther J., Stiles A., Champion J.D.: “The lived experience of ovarian cancer: A phenomenological approach”. J. am. Acad. Nurse Pract., 2012, 24, 595-603.

[23] Jayde V., Boughton M.: “The diagnostic journey of ovarian cancer: A review of the literature and suggestions for practice”. Contemp. Nurse, 2012, 41, 5-17.

[24] Pozzar R., Baldwin L., Goff B.A., Berry D.L.: “Patient, physi-cian, and caregiver perspectives on ovarian cancer treatment deci-sion making: lessons from a qualitative pilot study”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 2018, 4, 91

[25] Plotti F.F., Terranova C., Montera R., Damiani P., Aloisi A., Lopez S., et al.: “Economic impact among family caregivers of advanced ovarian cancer patients”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2014, 133, 177.

[26] Frost M.H., Johnson M.E., Atherton P.J., Petersen W.O., Dose A.M., Kasner M.J., et al.: “Spiritual Well-Being and Quality of Life of Women with Ovarian Cancer and Their Spouses”. the Journal of Supportive Oncology, 2012, 10, 72-80.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top