Article Data

  • Views 783
  • Dowloads 135

Editorials

Open Access

Minimally invasive surgery in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

  • Chyi-Long Lee1
  • Kuan-Gen Huang1
  • Peng-Teng Chua1,2,*,

1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Endoscopy & Minimally Invasive Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 33305, Linkou, Taiwan

2Mahkota Medical Centre, 75000, Malacca, Malaysia

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.06.2260 Vol.41,Issue 6,December 2020 pp.852-857

Submitted: 29 September 2020 Accepted: 02 November 2020

Published: 15 December 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Peng-Teng Chua E-mail: drchuapt@yahoo.com

Cite and Share

Chyi-Long Lee,Kuan-Gen Huang,Peng-Teng Chua. Minimally invasive surgery in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(6);852-857.

References

[1] Chiva L., Zanagnolo V., Querleu D., Martin-Calvo N., Arevalo-Serrano J., Capilna M.E., et al.: “SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2020, 30, 1269-1277.

[2] Ramirez P.T., Frumovitz M., Pareja R., Lopez A., Vieira M., Ribeiro R., et al.: “Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer”. N. Engl. J. Med., 2018, 379, 1895-1904.

[3] Guo S.: “Keep the pressure on for more transparency of clinical trials on endometriosis”. Gynecol. Minim .Invasive Ther., 2013, 2, 73- 74.

[4] Brandt B., Sioulas V., Basaran D., Kuhn T., LaVigne K., Gardner G. J., et al.: “Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2020, 156, 591-597.

[5] Vergote I., Magrina J.F., Zanagnolo V., Magtibay P.M., Butler K., Gil-Moreno A., et al.: “The LACC trial and minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2020, 27, 462- 463.

[6] Uppal S., Gehrig P.A., Peng K., Bixel K.L., Matsuo K., Vetter M.H., et al.: “Recurrence rates in patients with cervical cancer treated with abdominal versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional retrospective review study”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2020, 38, 1030-1040.

[7] Zhao Y., Hang B., Xiong G.W., Zhang X.W.: “Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech., 2017, 27, 1132-1144.

[8] Zhang S., Ding T., Cui Z., Lv Y., Jiang R.: “Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery”. Med (Baltimore), 2019, 98, e14171.

[9] Lim T.K., Lin K.M., Wong W., Aggarwal I., Yam P.L.: “Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Singapore”. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther., 2019, 8, 53-58.

[10] Lee C., Huang K., Nam J., Lim P., Shun F.W., Lee K., et al.: “The statement of the Asia-Pacific Association for Gynecologic En-doscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy for LACC study”. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther., 2019, 8, 91-93.

[11] Lee C.: “Minimally invasive therapy for cancer: It is time to take actions for training system in minimally invasive therapy after lacc report”. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther., 2019, 8, 1-3.

[12] Lee C., Wu K., Huang K., Lee P., Yen C.: “Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterectomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 203, 165. e1-165.e7.

[13] Chua P.T., Lee C.L., Huang K.G.: “100% 5-year survival rate in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer is an achievable task”. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther., 2020, 9, 53.

[14] Frumovitz M., Obermair A., Coleman R.L., Pareja R., Lopez A., Ribero R., et al.: “Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial”. Lancet Oncol., 2020, 21, 851-860.

[15] Weeks J.C., Nelson H., Gelber S., Sargent D., Schroeder G.: “Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial”. JAMA, 2002, 287, 321-328.

[16] Walker J.L., Piedmonte M.R., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S., et al.: “Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic oncology group study LAP2”. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 5331-5336.

[17] Biere S.S.A.Y., Cuesta M.A., van der Peet D.L.: “Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Minerva Chir., 2009, 64, 121-133.

[18] Diver E., Hinchcliff E., Gockley A., Melamed A., Contrino L., Feld-man S., et al.: “Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is associated with reduced morbidity and similar survival outcomes compared with laparotomy”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2017, 24, 402-406.

[19] Gil-Moreno A., Carbonell-Socias M., Salicrú S., Centeno-Mediavilla C., Franco-Camps S., Colas E., et al.: “Radical hysterectomy: efficacy and safety in the dawn of minimally invasive techniques”. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol., 2019, 26, 492-500.

[20] Chong G.O., Park N.Y., Hong D.G., Cho Y.L., Park I.S., Lee Y.S.: “Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2009, 19, 1459-1464.

[21] Lee C., Kay N.: “Inhibition of ovarian cancer growth and implantation by paclitaxel after laparoscopic surgery in a mouse model”. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 195, 1278-1281.

[22] Plante M., Renaud M.C., Sebastianelli A., Gregoire J.: “Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2020, 30, 981-986.

[23] Plante M., Gregoire J., Renaud M., Sebastianelli A., Grondin K., Noel P., et al.: “Simple vaginal trachelectomy in early-stage low-risk cervical cancer: a pilot study of 16 cases and review of the literature”. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer, 2013, 23, 916-922.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top