Article Data

  • Views 627
  • Dowloads 114

Original Research

Open Access

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is a rare histological subtype in Japan

  • Hideki Iwahashi1
  • Morikazu Miyamoto1,*,
  • Takahiro Sakamoto1
  • Hiroki Ishibashi1
  • Soichiro Kakimoto1
  • Hiroko Matsuura1
  • Hitoshi Tsuda2
  • Masashi Takano1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 359-0042 Saitama, Japan;Department of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 359-0042 Saitama, Japan

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.06.5462 Vol.41,Issue 6,December 2020 pp.1004-1009

Submitted: 02 January 2020 Accepted: 03 June 2020

Published: 15 December 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Morikazu Miyamoto E-mail: morikazu1118@hotmail.co.jp

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: To compare low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSC) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC). Materials and Methods: Between 1985 and 2013, patients with LGSC and HGSC were identified through pathological review using the 2014 World Health Organization classification. The clinical outcome of patients with LGSC and HGSC was retrospectively compared. Results: A total of 174 cases, 5 (2.9%) cases of LGSC and 169 (97.1%) cases of HGSC (97.1%) were identifies for our study. The proportion of patients who underwent optimal surgery was higher for LGSC than HGSC (p = 0.03). We found no other statistically significant differences in the characteristics of the two groups. Survival analysis revealed that the histological subtype was not an independent prognostic factor of Progression-free survival (p = 0.28) or overall survival (p = 0.43). Conclusions: LGSCs may be a rare histological subtype in Japan and may not be associated with a different prognosis than HGSC. Larger scales studies are needed to examine the clinical significance of LGSC.


Keywords

Ovarian carcinoma; Ovarian serous carcinoma; Low grade serous carcinoma; High grade serous carcinoma; Prognosis.


Cite and Share

Hideki Iwahashi,Morikazu Miyamoto,Takahiro Sakamoto,Hiroki Ishibashi,Soichiro Kakimoto,Hiroko Matsuura,Hitoshi Tsuda,Masashi Takano. Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is a rare histological subtype in Japan. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020. 41(6);1004-1009.

References

[1] Siegel R., Miller K.D., Jemal A.: “Cancer statistics, 2018.” CA. Cancer. J. Clin., 2018, 68, 7-30.

[2] Bowtell D.D., Böhm S., Ahmed A.A., Aspuria P., Bast R.C., Beral V., et al.: “Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer”. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2016, 15, 668-679.

[3] Kroeger P.T., Drapkin R.: “Pathogenesis and heterogeneity of ovar-ian cancer”. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2017, 29, 26-34.

[4] Cortez A.J., Tudrej P., Kujawa K.A., Lisowska K.M.: “Advances in ovarian cancer therapy”. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 2019, 81, 17- 38.

[5] Salani R., Bristow R.E.: “Surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer”. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., 2012, 55, 75-95.

[6] Omura G.A., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D., Yordan E., Major F.J., Buchsbaum H.J. et al.: “Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in advanced ovarian carcinoma: The gynecologic oncology group experience”. J. Clin. Oncol., 1991, 9, 1138-1150.

[7] Neijt J.P., ten Bokkel Huinink W.W., van der Burg M.E., van Oost-erom A.T., Willemse P.H., Vermorken J.B., et al.: “Long-term survival in ovarian cancer. Mature data from the netherlands joint study group for ovarian cancer”. Eur. J. Cancer, 1992, 27, 1367-1372.

[8] Thigpen T., Brady M.F., Omura G.A., Creasman W.T., McGuire W. P., Hoskins W.J. et al.: “Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. The gynecologic oncology group experience”. Cancer, 1993, 71, 606-614.

[9] McCluggage W.G.: “Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis”. Pathology, 2011, 43, 420-432.

[10] Schlumbrecht M.P., Sun C.C., Wong K.N., Broaddus R.R., Gershenson D.M., Bodurka D.C.: “Clinicodemographic factors influencing outcomes in patients with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma”. Cancer, 2011, 117, 3741-3749.

[11] Kaldawy A., Segev Y., Lavie O., Auslender R., Sopik V., Narod S. A.: “Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A review.” Gynecol. Oncol., 2016, 143, 433-438.

[12] Fader A.N., Java J., Ueda S., Bristow R.E., Armstrong D.K., Bookman M.A. et al.: “Survival in women with grade 1 serous ovarian carcinoma”. Obstet. Gynecol., 2013, 122, 225-232.

[13] Kurman R.J., Shih I.: “The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded”. Am. J. Pathol., 2016, 186, 733- 747.

[14] Shimizu Y., Kamoi S., Amada S., Akiyama F., Silverberg S.G.: “Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma: testing of a proposed system in a series of 461 patients with uniform treatment and follow-up”. Cancer, 1998, 82, 893- 901.

[15] International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.: “Classification and staging of malignant tumours in the female pelvis.” Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 1971, 50, 1-7.

[16] Malpica A., Deavers M.T., Lu K., Bodurka D.C., Atkinson E.N., Gershenson D.M. et al.: “Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a twotier system”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2004, 28, 496-504.

[17] Bonome T., Lee J.Y., Park D.C., Radonovich M., Pise-Masison C., Brady J., et al.: “Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary.” Cancer Res., 2005, 65, 10602.

[18] Chen M., Jin Y., Bi Y., Yin J., Wang Y., Pan L.: “A survival anal-ysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology”. Onco. Targets Ther., 2014, 7, 1891-1899.

[19] O’Neill C.J., Deavers M.T., Malpica A., Foster H., McCluggage W. G.: “An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2005, 29, 1034-1041.

[20] Singer G., Stöhr R., Cope L., Dehari R., Hartmann A., Cao D., et al.: “Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation”. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2005, 29, 218- 224.

[21] Carlson J., Roh M.H., Chang M.C., Crum C.P.: “Recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of serous carcinoma: the concept of low- and high-grade disease and the role of the fallopian tube”. Diagn. Histopathol. (Oxf), 2019, 14, 352-365.

[22] Kurman R.J., Carcangiu M.L., Herrington C.S., Young R.H.: “WHO Classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Fourth Edition.” Tumours of ovary. Lyon, IARC press, 2014.

[23] Diaz-Padilla I., Malpica A.L., Minig L., Chiva L.M., Gershenson D. M., Gonzalez-Martin A.: “Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma: a comprehensive update”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 126, 279-285.

[24] FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology.: “FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri.” Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 2014, 125, 97-98.

[25] Oken M.M., Creech R.H., Tormey D.C., Horton J., Davis T.E., Mc-Fadden E.T., et al.: “Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group.” Am. J. Clin. Oncol., 1982, 5, 649-655.

[26] Seidman J.D., Horkayne-Szakaly I., Cosin J.A., Ryu H.S., Haiba M., Boice C.R., et al.: “Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum”. Gynecol. Oncol., 2006, 103, 703-708.

[27] Bodurka D.C., Deavers M.T., Tian C., Sun C.C., Malpica A., Cole-man R.L., et al.: “Reclassification of serous ovarian carcinoma by a 2- tier system: a gynecologic oncology group study.” Cancer, 2012, 118, 3087.

[28] Hannibal C.G., Vang R., Junge J., Kjaerbye-Thygesen A., Kurman R. J., Kjaer S.K.: “A binary histologic grading system for ovarian serous carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor: a population-based study of 4317 women diagnosed in Denmark 1978-2006.” Gynecol. Oncol., 2012, 125, 655-660.

[29] Anglesio M.S., Carey M.S., Köbel M., Mackay H., Huntsman D.G.: “Vancouver ovarian clear cell symposium speakers. clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a report from the first ovarian clear cell symposium, June 24th, 2010.” Gynecol. Oncol., 2011, 121, 407-415.

[30] Sugiyama T., Kamura T., Kigawa J., Terakawa N., Kikuchi Y., Kita T., et al.: “Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy.” Cancer, 2000, 88, 2584.

[31] Chen M., Jin Y., Bi Y., Yin J., Wang Y., Pan L.: “A survival analysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology.” Onco. Targets. Ther., 2014, 7, 1891.

[32] Gershenson D.M., Sun C.C., Lu K.H., Coleman R.L., Sood A.K., Malpica A., et al.: “Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary.” Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 108, 361-368.

[33] Schmeler K.M., Sun C.C., Bodurka D.C., Deavers M.T., Malpica A., Coleman R.L., et al.: “Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum.” Gynecol. Oncol., 2008, 108, 510-514.

[34] Cho K., Shih I.: “Ovarian cancer.” Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis., 2009, 4, 287-313.

[35] Farley J., Brady W.E., Vathipadiekal V., Lankes H.A., Coleman R., Morgan M.A., et al.: “Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.” Lancet. Oncol., 2013, 14, 134-140.

[36] Vang R., Shih IeM., Kurman R.J.: “Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems”. Adv. Anat. Pathol., 2009, 16, 267-282.

[37] Malpica A., Deavers M.T., Tornos C., Kurman R.J., Soslow R., Sei-dman J.D., et al.: “Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a twotier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2007, 31, 1168-1174.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top