Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Study of laparoscopic monopolar devices and its thermal effects
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, 0608543 Sapporo, Japan
DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.01.2311 Vol.42,Issue 1,February 2021 pp.118-121
Submitted: 12 November 2020 Accepted: 30 December 2020
Published: 15 February 2021
*Corresponding Author(s): Motoki Matsuura E-mail: mmatsuura@sapmed.ac.jp
Objective: Energy devices are frequently used in minimally invasive surgeries (MIS). For MIS involving gynecologic malignancies, energy devices should be used cautiously to prevent thermal injuries to nearby organs. We evaluated monopolar electrosurgery devices and measured increases in temperature in the tissue and device. Methods: Briefly, the surface of a porcine tissue was incised using short and long activation times. Subsequently, the maximum temperature at the tip of the monopolar device, the cooling time required to reach a temperature of 60
Minimally invasive surgery; Monopolar device; Thermal injury
Motoki Matsuura,Masato Tamate,Sachiko Nagao,Muna Nishio,Tadahi Okada,Yoko Nishimura,Kyoko Isoyama,Noriko Terada,Tsuyoshi Saito. Study of laparoscopic monopolar devices and its thermal effects. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(1);118-121.
[1] Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW. Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 1994; 179: 161-170.
[2] Hulka JF, Levy BS, Parker WH, Phillips JM. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1995 Membership Survey. Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 1997; 4: 167-171.
[3] Govekar HR, Robinson TN, Stiegmann GV, McGreevy FT. Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue? Surgical Endoscopy. 2011; 25: 3499-3502.
[4] Taniguchi F, Wada-Hiraike O, Hirata T, Tajima H, Masuda H, Kitade M, et al. A nationwide survey on gynecologic endoscopic surgery in Japan, 2014-2016. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2019; 44: 2067-2076.
[5] Hwang JH, Kim BW. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020; 34: 1509-1521.
[6] Vetere PF, Apostolis C. Ureteral injury due to a harmonic scalpel during laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2010; 14: 115-119.
[7] Lin Y, Dionigi G, Randolph GW, Lu I, Chang P, Tsai S, et al. Electrophysiologic monitoring correlates of recurrent laryngeal nerve heat thermal injury in a porcine model. The Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: E283-E290.
[8] Eto K, Omura N, Haruki K, Uno Y, Ohkuma M, Nakajima S, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic energy devices on charges in thermal power after application to porcine mesentery. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2015; 25: e37-41.
[9] Kisch T, Liodaki E, Kraemer R, Mailaender P, Brandenburger M, Hellwig V, et al. Electrocautery devices with feedback mode and tefloncoated blades create less surgical smoke for a quality improvement in the operating theater. Medicine. 2015; 94: e1104.
[10] Krones CJ, Conze J, Hoelzl F, Stumpf M, Klinge U, Möller M, et al. Chemical composition of surgical smoke produced by electrocautery, harmonic scalpel and argon beaminga short study. European Surgery. 2007; 39: 118-121.
Top