Article Data

  • Views 726
  • Dowloads 119

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Clinical and demographic factors in endometrial and ovary carcinoma: synchronous carcinoma vs stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma

  • Laura Baquedano Mainar1,*,
  • Javier Navarro Sierra1
  • Leticia Alvarez Sarrado'1
  • Yasmina José Gutiérrez1
  • Marta Lamarca Ballestero1
  • Patricia Rubio Cuesta1
  • Ana C. Ruiz Peña2
  • Andrea Espiau Romera3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Pº Isabel la Católica 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Pedro, C/Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, Spain

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hopsital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Avda, Calle de San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4204099 Vol.42,Issue 4,August 2021 pp.643-648

Submitted: 20 January 2021 Accepted: 18 March 2021

Published: 15 August 2021

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 2021 AGOA Society)

*Corresponding Author(s): Laura Baquedano Mainar E-mail: lbaquedanome@hotmail.com; lbaquedano@salud.aragon.es

Abstract

Objective: To compare pre-surgical demographic and clinical factors and preoperative serum tumor marker values of patients with endometrial and ovarian synchronous carcinoma with those diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma with metastatic ovarian involvement (FIGO stage IIIA). Methods: A retrospective observational study including patients with endometrial and ovarian malignant tumors that were treated at Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain, since January 2000 to June 2020. All pathologic specimens were reviewed by two pathologists specialized in gynecological oncology. Results: Overall, 51 patients were included. 24 cases of them, were endometrial and ovarian synchronous primary carcinomas and the remaining 27 cases were endometrial tumors with adnexa. Parity, personal and family oncological history, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity and the prior use of hormone replacement therapy did not show significant differences between both groups. Age (p = 0.002), menopausal status (p = 0.029), abnormal uterine bleeding (p = 0.001), Ca 12.5 preoperative serum level (p = 0.038) and Ca 19.9 preoperative serum level (0.028) were factors with significant differences between both groups. In multivariate analysis, only abnormal uterine bleeding and Ca 19.9 values were independents factors. Conclusions: The presence of abnormal uterine bleeding and Ca 19.9 preoperative serum level could guide the clinician in the preoperative differential diagnosis between endometrial cancer with ovarian involvement and endometrial and ovarian synchronous carcinoma.


Keywords

Endometrial and ovarian synchronous tumors; Endometrial cancer; Synchronous tumors; Ca 19.9 tumor marker

Cite and Share

Laura Baquedano Mainar,Javier Navarro Sierra,Leticia Alvarez Sarrado',Yasmina José Gutiérrez,Marta Lamarca Ballestero,Patricia Rubio Cuesta,Ana C. Ruiz Peña,Andrea Espiau Romera. Clinical and demographic factors in endometrial and ovary carcinoma: synchronous carcinoma vs stage IIIA endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(4);643-648.

References

[1] Jain V, Sekhon R, Pasricha S, Giri S, Modi KB, Shrestha E, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers—a single-institute review of 43 cases. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2017; 27: 938–946.

[2] Zaino R, Whitney C, Brady MF, DeGeest K, Burger RA, Buller RE. Simultaneously detected endometrial and ovarian carcinomas—a prospective clinicopathologic study of 74 cases: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2001; 83: 355–362.

[3] Oranratanaphan S, Manchana T, Sirisabya N. Clinicopathologic variables and survival comparison of patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers versus primary endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2008; 9: 403–407.

[4] Chen L, Zhao Q, Lv X. Characteristics and prognosis of coexisting adnexa malignancy with endometrial cancer: a single institution review of 51 cases. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011; 283: 1133–1137.

[5] Ulbright TM, Roth LM. Metastatic and independent cancers of the endometrium and ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases. Human Pathology. 1985; 16: 28–34.

[6] Scully RE, Young RH, Clement PB. Tumors of the ovary, maldeveloped gonads, fallopian tube and broad ligament. Atlas of tumor pathology. Bethesda, MD: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 1998.

[7] Kandukuri SR, Rao J. FIGO 2013 staging system for ovarian cancer. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015; 27: 48–52.

[8] Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2009; 105: 109.

[9] Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2016; 27: 16–41.

[10] Querleu D, Planchamp F, Chiva L, Fotopoulou C, Barton D, Cibula D, et al. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) guidelines for ovarian cancer surgery. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2017; 27: 1534–1542.

[11] Soliman PT, Oh JC, Schmeler KM, Sun CC, Slomovitz BM, Gershenson DM, et al. Risk factors for young premenopausal women with endometrial cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 105: 575–580.

[12] Soliman PT, Slomovitz BM, Broaddus RR, Sun CC, Oh JC, Eifel PJ, et al. Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: a single institution review of 84 cases. Gynecologic Oncology. 2004; 94: 456–462.

[13] Key TJ, Pike MC. The dose-effect relationship between ‘unop-posed’ oestrogens and endometrial mitotic rate: its central role in explaining and predicting endometrial cancer risk. British Journal of Cancer. 1988; 57: 205–212.

[14] Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008; 371: 569–578.

[15] Bjørge T, Engeland A, Tretli S, Weiderpass E. Body size in relation to cancer of the uterine corpus in 1 million Norwegian women. International Journal of Cancer. 2007; 120: 378–383.

[16] Bodelon C, Wentzensen N, Schonfeld SJ, Visvanathan K, Hartge P, Park Y, et al. Hormonal risk factors and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer risk by parity. British Journal of Cancer. 2013; 109: 769–776.

[17] Usset JL, Raghavan R, Tyrer JP, McGuire V, Sieh W, Webb P, et al. Assessment of multifactor gene-environment interactions and ovarian cancer risk: candidate genes, obesity, and hormone-related risk factors. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2016; 25: 780–790.

[18] Moro F, Leombroni M, Pasciuto T, Trivellizzi IN, Mascilini F, Ciccarone F, et al. Synchronous primary cancers of endometrium and ovary vs endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis: an observational study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019; 53: 827–835.

[19] Uglietti A, Mazzei C, Deminico N, Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Fedele L. Endometrial polyps detected at ultrasound and rate of malignancy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013; 289: 839–843.

[20] Bracco Suarez MB, Benetti-Pinto CL, Gibran L, Yela DA. Asymp-tomatic postmenopausal women: what are the risk factors for endometrial malignancies? A multicentric retrospective study. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2020; 1–4.

[21] van Niekerk CC, Bulten J, Vooijs GP, Verbeek ALM. The association between primary endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary and synchronous malignancy of the endometrium. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2010; 2010: 1–5.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top