Article Data

  • Views 814
  • Dowloads 153

Original Research

Open Access

Does the consumption of pasta, rice and groats affect the risk of cancer of women's reproductive organs and breast?

  • Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman1,*,
  • Piotr Merks2,3
  • Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka4
  • Małgorzata Mizgier5

1Hipolit Cegielski State University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, 62-200 Gniezno, Poland

2Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, A. Jurasza 2, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland

3Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum. Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland

4Division of Developmental Gynecology and Sexology, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-535 Poznań, Poland

5Department of Dietetics, Poznan University of Physical Education Faculty of Physical Culture in Gorzów Wielkopolski 61-871 Poznań, Poland

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4204101 Vol.42,Issue 4,August 2021 pp.655-661

Submitted: 05 December 2020 Accepted: 09 February 2021

Published: 15 August 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman E-mail: plagens.rotman@gmail.com

Abstract

Objetcive: To determine whether the consumption, together with the frequency and quantity of consumption of wholegrain pasta, rice and groats is related to the risk of reproductive and breast cancer among women. Material and methods: Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) covering the 12 months prior to diagnosis was used. It consisted of questions evaluating the frequency of consumption of specific cereal products that may contribute to the development of or protect against malignant reproductive or breast tumours. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in relation to the frequency of consumption of rice and pasta. Groats were consumed significantly more often by the ill women (women with gynaecologic malignancy) (p < 0.05). However, the ill women consumed smaller quantities of groats, rice and pasta than the healthy women (control group). The healthy women consumed more cereal products and significantly more rice compared to the ill women (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Age was the main factor impacting the incidence of breast and reproductive tract cancer, followed by the consumption of long-grain rice, aromatic rice, and BMI. A higher mean age and BMI was noted among the ill women. The consumption of long rice was higher among healthy women, while the consumption of aromatic rice was higher among women with cancer.


Keywords

Pasta; Rice; Groats; Risk factors

Cite and Share

Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman,Piotr Merks,Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka,Małgorzata Mizgier. Does the consumption of pasta, rice and groats affect the risk of cancer of women's reproductive organs and breast?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(4);655-661.

References

[1] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015—2020 Dietary guidelines for Americans. 2015. Available at: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/gu idelines/ (Accessed: 7 April 2016).

[2] Cho SS, Qi L, Fahey GC, Klurfeld DM. Consumption of cereal fiber, mixtures of whole grains and bran, and whole grains and risk reduction in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013; 98: 594–619.

[3] Slavin J. Whole grains and human health. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2004; 17: 99–110.

[4] World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, and physical activity and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research. 2007.

[5] Jacobs DR, Slavin J, Marquart L. Whole grain intake and cancer: a review of the literature. Nutrition and Cancer. 1995; 24: 221–229.

[6] Jacobs DR, Marquart L, Slavin J, Kushi LH. Whole-grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutrition and Cancer. 1998; 30: 85–96.

[7] Plagens-Rotman K, Piskorz-Szymendera M, Chmaj-Wierzychowska K, Pieta B. Breast cancer-analysis of the selected risk factors. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2017; 38: 425–430.

[8] Slavin JL. Mechanisms for the impact of whole grain foods on cancer risk. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2000; 19: 300S–307S.

[9] Cotterchio M, Boucher BA, Manno M, Gallinger S, Okey A, Harper P. Dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk. Journal of Nutrition. 2006; 136: 3046–3053.

[10] Cotterchio M, Boucher BA, Kreiger N, Mills CA, Thompson LU. Dietary phytoestrogen intake—lignans and isoflavones—and breast cancer risk (Canada). Cancer Causes & Control. 2008; 19: 259–272.

[11] Plagens-Rotman K, Żak E, Pięta B. Odds ratio analysis in women with endometrial cancer. Menopause Review. 2016; 15: 12–19.

[12] Plagens-Rotman K, Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Pięta B, Bojar I. Modifiable lifestyle factors and ovarian cancer incidence in women. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2018; 25: 36–40.

[13] Aune D, Chan DSM, Greenwood DC, Vieira AR, Rosenblatt DAN, Vieira R, et al. Dietary fiber and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Annals of Oncology. 2012; 23: 1394–1402.

[14] Aune D, Chan DSM, Lau R, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, et al. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2011; 343: d6617.

[15] Larsson SC. Magnesium intake in relation to risk of colorectal cancer in women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2005; 293: 86.

[16] Fardet A. New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre? Nutrition Research Reviews. 2010; 23: 65–134.

[17] Borneo R, León AE. Whole grain cereals: functional components and health benefits. Food & Function. 2012; 3: 110–119.

[18] Harland JI, Garton LE. Whole-grain intake as a marker of healthy body weight and adiposity. Public Health Nutrition. 2008; 11: 554–563.

[19] McKeown NM, Yoshida M, Shea MK, Jacques PF, Lichtenstein AH, Rogers G, et al. Whole-Grain intake and cereal fiber are associated with lower abdominal adiposity in older adults. The Journal of Nutrition. 2009; 139: 1950–1955.

[20] Roberts DL, Dive C, Renehan AG. Biological mechanisms linking obesity and cancer risk: new perspectives. Annual Review of Medicine. 2010; 61: 301–316.

[21] Shikata K, Ninomiya T, Kiyohara Y. Diabetes mellitus and cancer risk: review of the epidemiological evidence. Cancer Science. 2013; 104: 9–14.

[22] Kim H, Stote KS, Behall KM, Spears K, Vinyard B, Conway JM. Glucose and insulin responses to whole grain breakfasts varying in soluble fiber, β-glucan. European Journal of Nutrition. 2009; 48: 170–175.

[23] Samra RA, Anderson GH. Insoluble cereal fiber reduces appetite and shortterm food intake and glycemic response to food consumed 75 min later by healthy men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007; 86: 972–979.

[24] Plagens-Rotman K, Piskorz-Szymendera M, Pięta B. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2020; 41: 233–239.

[25] Dziedzic K, Górecka D, Szwengiel A, Olejnik A, Rychlik J, Kreft I, et al. The cytotoxic effect of artificially digested buckwheat products on HT-29 colon cancer cells. Journal of Cereal Science. 2018; 83: 68–73.

[26] Hole AS, Rud I, Grimmer S, Sigl S, Narvhus J, Sahlstrøm S. Improved bioavailability of dietary phenolic acids in whole grain barley and oat groat following fermentation with probiotic lactobacillus acidophilus, lactobacillus johnsonii, and lactobacillus reuteri. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012; 60: 6369–6375.

[27] Qureshi AA, Peterson DM, Hasler-Rapacz JO, Rapacz J. Novel tocotrienols of rice bran suppress cholesterogenesis in hereditary hypercholesterolemic swine. Journal of Nutrition. 2001; 131: 223–230.

[28] Xu H, Ding Y, Xin X, Wang W, Zhang D. Dietary fiber intake is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis. Nutrition Research. 2018; 57: 1–11.

[29] Dong J, He K, Wang P, Qin L. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011; 94: 900–905.

[30] Mahabir S. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Yearbook of Oncology. 2012; 2012: 16–18.

[31] Gnagnarella P, Gandini S, La Vecchia C, Maisonneuve P. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008; 87: 1793–1801.

[32] Schlesinger S, Chan DSM, Vingeliene S, Vieira AR, Abar L, Polemiti E, et al. Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrition Reviews. 2017; 75: 420–441.

[33] Stasiewicz B, Wadolowska L, Biernacki M, Slowinska MA, Droz-dowski M. Hybrid dietary-blood inflammatory profiles and post-menopausal breast cancer: a case-control study. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 3503.

[34] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015; 65: 5–29.

[35] Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2012; 62: 30–67.

[36] Demuth A, Czerniak U. Eating habits and preferences of polish women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2019; 20: 1803–1808.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top