Article Data

  • Views 768
  • Dowloads 157

Original Research

Open Access

Lymph node dissection in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

  • Nejat Ozgul1
  • Utku Akgor1,*,
  • Mehmet Coskun Salman1
  • Oguzhan Kuru2
  • Murat Gultekın1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230 Ankara, Turkey

2Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cerrahpaşa University, 34098 İstanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4206167 Vol.42,Issue 6,December 2021 pp.1146-1152

Submitted: 14 October 2021 Accepted: 19 November 2021

Published: 15 December 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Utku Akgor E-mail: utkuakgor@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on survival for patients with intermediate risk (IR) and high intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Clinicopathologic features and survival data of 1294 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgical treatment for EC between 2003 and 2018 were retrieved from the database of Hacettepe University Hospital. This study compared the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among IR and HIR EC between patients with LND and no LND. Results: The study population included 141 (55%) IR, and 115 (45%) HIR EC patients. LND was not performed in 33 (23.4%), and 31 (27%) patients in IR, and HIR EC patients, respectively. The lymph node involvement was 10.3% (n = 20) among all patients. During the median follow-up of 41 months (range, 12–222), 12 (6.2%) patients with LND, and 5 (7.8%) patients without LND had disease recurrence (p = 0.77). LND did not improve OS and DFS in IR and HIR EC patients (p = 0.92, p = 0.80). And the lymph node count was not associated with OS and DFS for all subsets of patients with EC grouped by recurrence risks. Conclusion: Without illuminating the morbidity of LND, there was no difference observed in OS and DFS between IR and HIR EC patients with LND-induced complications and no LND. With this regard, the LND can be omitted for minimizing the possible post-operative morbidities in this selected patient groups.

Keywords

Endometrial cancer; Intermediate risk; High intermediate risk; Survival

Cite and Share

Nejat Ozgul,Utku Akgor,Mehmet Coskun Salman, Oguzhan Kuru,Murat Gultekın. Lymph node dissection in intermediate and high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(6);1146-1152.

References

[1] Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet. 2016; 387: 1094–1108.

[2] Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. The Lancet. 2009; 373: 125– 136.

[3] Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, Alberto Lissoni A, Signorelli M, Scambia G, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008; 100: 1707–1716.

[4] Bogani G, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Ghezzi F, Rossetti D, Mariani A. Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: current evidence. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2014; 40: 301–311.

[5] Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2018; 16: 170–199.

[6] Colombo N, Preti E, Landoni F, Carinelli S, Colombo A, Marini C, et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2013; 24: vi33–vi38.

[7] Kim HS, Suh DH, Kim MK, Chung HH, Park NH, Song YS. Systematic lymphadenectomy for survival in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncol- ogy. 2012; 42: 405–412.

[8] Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2016; 27: 16–41.

[9] Cragun JM, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, Synan I, Secord AA, Soper JT, et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23: 3668–3675.

[10] Ignatov A, Ivros S, Bozukova M, Papathemelis T, Ortmann O, Eggemann H. Systematic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020; 302: 231–239.

[11] Bougherara L, Azaïs H, Béhal H, Canlorbe G, Ballester M, Bendi- fallah S, et al. Does lymphadenectomy improve survival in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer? A multicentric study from the FRANCOGYN Research Group. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2019; 29: 282–289.

[12] Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, Haddock MG, Calori G, Podratz KC. Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000; 182: 1506–1519.

[13] Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, Spirtos NM, Bloss JD, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gyneco- logic Oncology. 2004; 92: 744–751.

[14] Lutman CV, Havrilesky LJ, Cragun JM, Secord AA, Calingaert B, Berchuck A, et al. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prog- nostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 102: 92–97.

[15] Seagle BL, Gilchrist-Scott D, Graves S, Strohl AE, Nieves-Neira W, Shahabi S. Association of Lymph Node Count and Overall Survival in Node-Negative Endometrial Cancers. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 2017; 1: 10.1200/CCI.16.00064.

[16] Sharma C, Deutsch I, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Qiao Y, Sun X, et al. Lymphadenectomy influences the utilization of adjuvant radiation treatment for endometrial cancer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011; 205: 562.e1–562.e9.

[17] Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, Lev G, Sonoda Y, Aghajanian C, et al. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecologic Oncology. 2006; 103: 714–718.

[18] Coronado PJ, Rychlik A, Martínez-Maestre MA, Baquedano L, Fasero M, García-Arreza A, et al. Role of lymphadenectomy in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: a matched-pair study. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2018; 29: e1.

[19] Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. The Lancet. 2010; 375: 1165–1172.

[20] Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Body G, Canlorbe G, Touboul C, Graesslin O, et al. Call for Surgical Nodal Staging in Women with ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer: a Multicentre Cohort Analysis from the FRANCOGYN Study Group. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2017; 24: 1660–1666.

[21] Nugent EK, Bishop EA, Mathews CA, Moxley KM, Tenney M, Mannel RS, et al. Do uterine risk factors or lymph node metastasis more significantly affect recurrence in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma? Gynecologic Oncology. 2012; 125: 94–98.

[22] Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, Soslow RA, Hensley ML, Leitao MM Jr, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecologic Oncology. 2009; 115: 236–238.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top