Article Data

  • Views 674
  • Dowloads 145

Original Research

Open Access

Sexual, psychological, interpersonal well-being and (unmet) supportive care needs of couples after a gynecological cancer treatment

  • Dalex Pernelle1
  • Koheeallee Kaneez1
  • Undurraga Malinverno Manuela2
  • Petignat Patrick2
  • Aerts Leen2,*,

1Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland

2Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4206178 Vol.42,Issue 6,December 2021 pp.1228-1235

Submitted: 08 April 2021 Accepted: 01 June 2021

Published: 15 December 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Aerts Leen E-mail: Leen.Aerts@hcuge.ch

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the sexual and psychosocial functioning of couples after a gynecological cancer treatment and their (unmet) supportive care needs. Methods: Patients treated for a gynecological cancer at the Geneva University Hospitals in Switzerland between January 2012 and September 2019 and their partners completed self-reported validated questionnaires on anxiety, depression, sexual function, relationship satisfaction, sexual communication and (unmet) supportive care needs. Results: Sixteen couples participated in the study. Mean age was 59.5 (range 46–72) for women and 63 (range 50–76) for men. The mean duration since treatment was 3 years (range = 1–7). 38% of women and 33% of men reported moderate to high levels of anxiety whereas 18, 75% of women and no men suffered from moderate to severe depression. Sixty percent of patients reported a sexual dysfunction and 40% reported significant sexual distress. Eighteen percent of men reported an erectile dysfunction and 33% reported a significant sexual distress. Whereas most couples were satisfied about their relationship, difficulties in sexual communication were expressed. Receiving psychological support, information and help with the changes in the sexual life were the most widely supported care needs. Although the highest domains of unmet needs were in the informational, relational and physical domain, more than 50% of couples reported unmet needs in the sexual domain. Conclusion: Gynecological cancer negatively affects the psychosexual well-being of couples. Support during and after treatment should take psychological and sexual aspects and the partner perspective into account.

Keywords

Gynecological cancer; Sexual function; Psychological well-being; Couple relationship; Unmet supportive care needs

Cite and Share

Dalex Pernelle, Koheeallee Kaneez,Undurraga Malinverno Manuela,Petignat Patrick,Aerts Leen. Sexual, psychological, interpersonal well-being and (unmet) supportive care needs of couples after a gynecological cancer treatment. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021. 42(6);1228-1235.

References

[1] Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Levi F, Chatenoud L, Negri E, et al. Cancer mortality in Europe, 2005–2009, and an overview of trends since 1980. Annals of Oncology. 2013; 24: 2657–2671.

[2] Thompson DS, Shear MK. Psychiatric disorders and gynecological oncology: a review of the literature. General Hospital Psychiatry. 1998; 20: 241–247.

[3] Giacomoni C, Venturini E, Hoarau H, Guyon F, Conri V. How women with gynaecological cancer deal with treatment: issues of visibility and invisibility. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite. 2014; 42: 795–799.

[4] Corney RH, Everett H, Howells A, Crowther ME. Psychosocial adjustment following major gynaecological surgery for carcinoma of the cervix and vulva. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1992; 36: 561–568.

[5] Burns M, Costello J, Ryan-Woolley B, Davidson S. Assessing the impact of late treatment effects in cervical cancer: an exploratory study of women’s sexuality. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2007; 16: 364–372.

[6] Cull A, Cowie V, Farquharson D, Livingstone J, Smart G, Elton R. Early stage cervical cancer: psychosocial and sexual outcomes of treatment. British Journal of Cancer. 1993; 68: 1216–1220.

[7] Given BA, Given CW, Kozachik S. Family Support in Advanced Cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2001; 51: 213–231.

[8] Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999; 340: 1383–1389.

[9] Aerts L, Enzlin P, Verhaeghe J, Poppe W, Vergote I, Amant F. Long-term sexual functioning in women after surgical treatment of cervical cancer stage IA to IB. International Journal of Gyneco- logical Cancer. 2014; 24: 1527–1534.

[10] Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 228.

[11] Hill EK, Sandbo S, Abramsohn E, Makelarski J, Wroblewski K, Wenrich ER, et al. Assessing gynaecologic and breast cancer sur- vivors’ sexual health care needs. Cancer. 2011; 117: 2643–2651.

[12] Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. STAI Manual for the State―Trait Anxiety lnventory. California: Consulting Psychol- ogists Press. 1970.

[13] Beck AT, Beamesderfer A. Assessment of depression: the depres- sion inventory. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974; 7: 151–169.

[14] Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual func- tion. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2000; 26: 191–208.

[15] Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidi- mensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997; 49: 822–830.

[16] Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The Fe- male Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2002; 28: 317–330.

[17] Catania, J. Help-seeking: An avenue for adult sexual development. San Francisco: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California. 1986.

[18] Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007; 21: 572–583.

[19] Hoellen F, Wagner JF, Lüdders DW, Rody A, Banz-Jansen C. Anxiety in caregiving partners of breast cancer patients. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2019; 300: 993–1005.

[20] Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt GE, Wyse R, Hobbs KM, Wain G. Life after cancer: couples’ and partners’ psychological adjustment and supportive care needs. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2007; 15: 405–415.

[21] Aerts L, Enzlin P, Verhaeghe J, Poppe W, Vergote I, Amant F. Sexual functioning in women after surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: a prospective controlled study. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2015; 12: 198–209.

[22] Manne SL, Kashy DA, Virtue S, Criswell KR, Kissane DW, Ozga M, et al. Acceptance, social support, benefit-finding, and depression in women with gynecological cancer. Quality of Life Re- search. 2018; 27: 2991–3002.

[23] Angst J, Gamma A, Gastpar M, Lépine JP, Mendlewicz J, Tylee A. Depression Research in European Society Study. Gender differences in depression. Epidemiological findings from the European DEPRES I and II studies. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2002; 252: 201–209.

[24] Lalos A. The impact of diagnosis on cervical and endometrial cancer patients and their spouses. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 1997; 18: 513–519.

[25] Gilbert E, Ussher JM, Perz J. Sexuality after gynaecological cancer: a review of the material, intrapsychic, and discursive aspects of treatment on women’s sexual-wellbeing. Maturitas. 2011; 70: 42– 57.

[26] Hendrickx L, Gijs L, Enzlin P. Sexual Difficulties and Associ- ated Sexual Distress in Flanders (Belgium): a Representative Population-Based Survey Study. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2016; 13: 650–668.

[27] Bai J, Belcher SM, Meador R, Daniel G, Shelton J, Patel P, et al. Comparisons of Depression, Sexual Function, and Quality of Life between Women with Gynecological Cancers and Race-Matched Healthy Controls. Cancer Nursing. 2019. (in press)

[28] Juraskova I, Butow P, Robertson R, Sharpe L, McLeod C, Hacker N. Post-treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight. Psycho-Oncology. 2003; 12: 267–279.

[29] Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 228.

[30] Vermeer WM, Bakker RM, Kenter GG, Stiggelbout AM, Ter Kuile MM. Cervical cancer survivors’ and partners’ experiences with sexual dysfunction and psychosexual support. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016; 24: 1679–1687.

[31] Mazariego CG, Juraskova I, Campbell R, Smith DP. Long-term unmet supportive care needs of prostate cancer survivors: 15-year follow-up from the NSW Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes Study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020; 28: 5511–5520.

[32] Molassiotis A, Wilson B, Blair S, Howe T, Cavet J. Unmet sup- portive care needs, psychological well-being and quality of life in patients living with multiple myeloma and their partners. Psycho-Oncology. 2011; 20: 88–97.

[33] Urbaniec OA, Collins K, Denson LA, Whitford HS. Gynecological cancer survivors: assessment of psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2012; 29: 534–551.

[34] MacLennan SJ, MacLennan S. How Do We Meet the Supportive Care and Information Needs of Those Living With and Beyond Bladder Cancer? Frontiers in Oncology. 2020; 10 :465.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top