Article Data

  • Views 920
  • Dowloads 185

Case Reports

Open Access

Uterine cavity evacuation as a novel approach for uterine size reduction during minimal invasive surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma: a report of two cases

  • Alice Hue Chen1,*,
  • Lauren Turker2
  • Joseph DiVito3
  • Dennis Yi-Shin Kuo2,4

1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

2Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

3Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

4Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA

DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo4302044 Vol.43,Issue 2,April 2022 pp.372-376

Submitted: 23 February 2021 Accepted: 27 April 2021

Published: 15 April 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Alice Hue Chen E-mail:


Background: Uterine carcinosarcoma often presents with significant uterine distention. This makes it difficult to perform minimally invasive surgery, which is preferred for uterine cancer given the significant recovery benefits. Cases: We present two cases of uterine carcinosarcoma in which we performed uterine evacuation intraoperatively to decompress the uterine volume to facilitate specimen removal through the vagina. The first patient ultimately had stage IA disease. She received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation and has remained disease-free for 2 years. The second patient had stage IVB disease on final pathology report. She received adjuvant chemotherapy but had disease recurrence 4 months after completion of treatment. Conclusion: Intraoperative uterine evacuation during surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma may make possible a minimally invasive procedure in patients with large, distended uteri.


Uterine carcinosarcoma; Minimally invasive surgery; Surgical techniques

Cite and Share

Alice Hue Chen,Lauren Turker,Joseph DiVito,Dennis Yi-Shin Kuo. Uterine cavity evacuation as a novel approach for uterine size reduction during minimal invasive surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma: a report of two cases. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2022. 43(2);372-376.


[1] Singh R. Review literature on uterine carcinosarcoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics. 2014; 10: 461–468.

[2] Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer. Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012; 30: 695–700.

[3] Fader AN, Java J, Tenney M, Ricci S, Gunderson CC, Temkin SM, et al. Impact of histology and surgical approach on survival among women with early-stage, high-grade uterine cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary analysis. Gynecologic Oncology. 2016; 143: 460–465.

[4] Cantrell LA, Blank SV, Duska LR. Uterine carcinosarcoma: a review of the literature. Gynecologic Oncology. 2015; 137: 581–588.

[5] Villena-Heinsen C, Diesing D, Fischer D, Griesinger G, Maas N, Diedrich K, et al. Carcinosarcomas—a retrospective analysis of 21 patients. Anticancer Research. 2006; 26: 4817–4823.

[6] Yi Y, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo W, Su Y. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2011; 159: 1–18.

[7] Nieboer TE, Hendriks JCM, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 119: 85–91.

[8] Teo SY, Babagbemi KT, Peters HE, Mortele KJ. Primary malignant mixed mullerian tumor of the uterus: findings on sonography, CT, and gadolinium-enhanced MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008; 191: 278–283.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Submission Turnaround Time